ratskull

I'd say that list is just about right. I wouldn't sweet talk Hartnell at all. I would say "Accept a trade or just go home. Those are your options."

1. Sabres trade Ryan Miller to No one 2. NY Islanders trade Thomas Vanek to Minnesota 3. Sabres trade Matt Moulson to LA Kings 4. Oilers trade Ales Hemsky to Chicago 5. Hurricanes trade Ron Hainsey to Boston 6. Devils trade Jaromir Jagr to Pittsburgh 7. Oilers trade Sam Gagner to New Jersey 8. NYRangers trade Ryan Callahan to Buffalo 9. Stars trade Trevor Daley to No one 10. Panthers trade Brad Boyes to St. Louis 11. Avalanche trade P-A Parenteau to Montreal 12. Hurricanes trade Tuomo Ruutu to Detroit 13. Flames trade Matt Stajan to No one 14. Flames trade Lee Stempniak to No one 15. Blues trade Jaroslav Halak to Winnipeg 16. Oilers trade Nail Yakupov to No one 17. Flyers trade Andrej Meszaros to No one 18. Jets trade Dustin Byfuglien to Philadelphia 19. Blues trade Chris Stewart to New York Rangers 20. Leafs trade Nazem Kadri to No one

I agree 100%. There is absolutely no reason to have Rosehill in the lineup. If this team is serious about winning, they need to lose that dead weight.If they need someone who cannot score on the fourth line, put Hartnell there and bring back McGinn for the second line.

In a heartbeat.

In your scenario, I'd take Yandle and Coyotes 1st rounder. I wouldn't trade Couts or Schenn at least not for draft picks. If I could move Couts for another stud D-man, I would do that. So, if things worked out, we'd have Yandle and [other stud D-man], Coyotes 1st rounder and Schenn. Laughton fills in for Couts.

Why can't Philly ever pick up a marginal player for "future considerations". Another draft pick pissed away.

If Lindros could have stayed healthy and the issues between him and Clark never existed, the team may have eventually been able to build the depth necessary for the team to win a cup. The Legion of Doom we're awesome to watch, but you are right. A one line team is not enough today.

I would do that trade in a heartbeat. I agree that Weber would not guarantee a cup. No one player can guarantee a cup. But players like Weber only come around so often and if you have an opportunity to snag one, you do it. The Schenn's "could" turn out to be great players, but Weber "is" a great player. With all that said, the Schenn's wouldn't be enough to land Weber and as you add more to the deal the less appealing it would be.

You have to have a lot of gall to be a Pens fan and call anybody out over an elbow or hit to the head.

Thanks for posting the videos. It's an awesome day today! What a team!

@Vanflyer That setup sounds reasonable to me. It beats the heck out of what they have in place now.

@Vanflyer I was talking about the current system and why I think the league does it. I wasn't referring to your formatting. I was just saying that by artificially moving teams in weaker divisions like Florida to the top 3, the league gives that team a better chance to get out of the first round because they play a weaker opponent and they have home ice advantage thus improving the chance that a more geographically diverse selection of teams survive longer in the playoffs. If the Eastern conference was ranked properly Florida would play a tougher opponent and not have home ice and essentially their division wouldn't have a representation in the next round, which could lead to less fans watching the games because their region is not represented. Just speculation. I think that the current playoff structure is ridiculous and should be changed. But, then again, I don't agree with a lot of things that the league does (Shootouts, All-Star game drafts, instigator rule etc.)

The league won't change the current set up because it is all about giving more market areas a chance to cheer for a team. Under the current system there is a higher chance, that geographically, teams that move on in the playoffs will not be all from one area. For example, because the league has boosted Florida in the standings they have a greater chance of making it to the second round. This gives hockey fans in their region a team to cheer for. If they were at the bottom where they belong, they would have a greater chance of losing and then no teams would represent that geographic area. It's all about TV ratings, ad revenue, and fan support. The NHL could give a rat's *** about being fair. It's all about the money. I support the league level setup. It's the fairest option and I think it would be way more entertaining. Imagine meeting a division rival in the Stanley Cup finals!

I have to agree with AndyS. To trade two of your core players and then lead the league in scoring wasn't even on my radar. I wanted both Carter and Richards outta here, but I never thought it would happen. When it did happen, my expectations were that the team would suffer offensively, but they haven't at all. That was a big surprise and a welcome one!

After watching today's game, They should be seriously looking at getting a goalie. The Russian experiment in net needs to end. Bryz isn't going anywhere so I would do whatever it took to get Schneider or Bernier and sit Bryz as long as it takes to wake him up. If that didn't work, he wouldn't play any more. I'd pay him a fortune to sit in the rafters.