Jump to content
  • entries
    34
  • comments
    111
  • views
    17,124

1972 Under the Microscope


henderson1.jpg

 

The 1972 Summit Series between the Canadian and Soviet national teams was one of the most monumental events in hockey history.  On top of that, the game-winning goal by Paul Henderson to complete the Canadian comeback is now considered one of the most iconic moments in the sport's history. Despite the fact that the Soviet team had already begun its impressive Olypmic gold medal run, it was still a coming out party of sorts for the "Big Red Machine." The Summit Series left no doubt that the best Soviet players could hold their own with the best Canadian players and that North America no longer had a stranglehold on the top levels of the sport. That said, in this post, I want to give a few reasons why I do not think that the Summit Series would have been quite as close as it was with all things being equal.

 

Reason #1 Unreasonable Expectations

 

Say what you want about the players being professionals. Having the weight of the expectations of a country -- or the weight of the Western world, in some respects -- is a tough load for anyone to carry. Thanks to the "us versus them" mentality of the Cold War, that is exactly where team Canada found themselves. While it is true that the Soviet team would have felt that pressure to some degree, there was something that added to the pressure on the Canadians: they were not only expected to win; they were expected to win big. After all, hockey was Canada's sport.

 

In fact, no less of a name than goaltending legend Jacques Plante brashly predicted that the Canadians would sweep all eight games. So sure was he of that prediction and that Soviet goaltender Vladislav Tretiak would be embarrassed that he offered advice to Tretiak that he thought would help to temper that. Allan Eagleson agreed. "We gotta win in eight games. Anything less than an unblemished sweep of the Russians would bring shame down on the heads of the players and the national pride." I say all of that to say this: had the Summit Series been a true exhibition series with no pressure on, I believe that would have helped the Canadians a little.

 

Reason #2 Soviet Gamesmanship

 

This one took a lot of different forms. Perhaps there was some suggestion of what was to come when the Soviets downplayed their chances by stating they were playing merely to learn. During the course of the series, the Soviets practically threw a fit after game two, blaming the officials for their loss and demanding a change of officials for game four. Before game eight, they nearly reneged on an officiating agreement hoping to have two officials that had heavily favored them in game five. It took a threat of the Canadians pulling out to force a compromise. During games played in Moscow, the goal official sometimes refused to turn on the goal light after Canadian scores. In fact, Canadian coach Harry Sinden went as far as to send his entire team onto the ice to ensure that Henderson's goal in game seven would be counted.

 

The gamesmanship was not restricted to the on the ice product. It reached as far as the players' wives. Originally, arrangements were made to house the Canadian players and their wives in separate hotels, nearly leading to a boycott by the Canadians. Even after new arrangements were made to house both the players and their wives in the Intourist, the poor treatment of the wives continued. They were fed substandard food and resorted to going to the dressing room looking for more food.

 

Reason #3 Missing Players

 

Part of this could be avoided; part of it could not. The team was without Bobby Orr, who was injured. Sinden wanted Bobby Hull on the roster, but the NHL insisted that WHA players be ruled ineligible, guaranteeing that Hull could not suit up for Canada. Before the tournament began, Gerry Cheevers, Derek Sanderson, and J.C. Tremblay all became inelligible for the same reason. Harold Ballard, the owner of the Toronto Maple Leafs, and no fan of the WHA argued for the inclusion of WHA players. Hockey Canada governor Phil Reimer resigned over the controversy. No less of a name than Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau waded into the conversation, hoping to guarantee that Canada put out its very best, but it was all for naught as Hockey Canada refused to back away from its agreement with the NHL.

 

There can be no doubt that if those involved could have moved past hurt feelings and grudges that names like Hull could have played. In no way could that be called unavoidable. As for Orr, injuries are definitely a part of hockey, but if we are going to consider a perfect environment for the series, he would have been there too. If the Summit had been held at the right time, under the right circumstances, Team Canada could have been a bit better.

 

Reason #4 Poor Conditioning

 

Consider the fact that after game five, Gilbert Perreault asked to return home in order to get into shape for the upcoming NHL season. That tells you all you need to know about
the conditioning of the Canadian team. Several of the Canadian players commented on how poor their conditioning was compared to their Soviet counterparts. However, Bobby Clarke
also commented on how the series changed as the physical shape of Team Canada improved. "Our conditioning was poor. But once we got into shape and were at the same level of
physical conditioning as them, we were able to handle it. And once we got into the same condition as them and had some games under our belt, they couldn't handle us." Clarke's comment makes sense when the Canadian and Soviet portions of the series are compared. The Canadians went 1-2-1 in Canada and 3-0-0 in Moscow. Would they have fared better had they started the series in better shape? It seems highly likely.

 

Reason #5 The Soviet Team

 

The last word is the key word: team. Ostensibly, they were amateurs. Officially, many of them were in the army. In reality, they were hockey players. They were amateur in name only. In fact, the rosters of the Soviet National Team and the dominant Soviet League team, CSKA Moscow were largely the same. Therefore, in addition to training together as the national team, many of the players were familiar with one another as teammates on the club level. That fact was key in helping the Soviets establish their dominance in Olympic and World Championship competitions.

 

There was, of course, no such set up for the Canadians. There were 14 teams in the NHL at the time, and the top players were spread out across those rosters. Since "professionals" were not allowed to play in the Olympics in those days, there was no "Canadian National Team" in the same sense as the Soviets had one. The Summit Series was then, a true team playing against a group of scattered all-stars.

 

There can be no doubt that the Soviets proved their mettle. There can be no doubt that they outperformed expectaions, and they are certainly worthy of recognition for such. They certainly had some of the best players in the world. But, all things said, I think the Canadians were better than their record indicated. Then again, maybe we owe the Soviets some thanks. After all, they proved to us North Americans that we are not the only ones who can play great hockey.

  • Like 2

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

yave1964

Posted

Great article, as usual Scott. My favorite era for the game.

 I would add officiating (although that very well might fall under gamesmanship) as the games in the USSR were so poorly officiated that the men in stripes were almost like having an extra player in the other side. It got so bad the that mild mannered easy going JP Parise lifted his stick above his head and had to restrain himself from tomahawking a ref for calling yet another bogus penalty.

 

  Yeah keeping Cheevers, Hull, Tremblay and Sanderson from playing was simply a lame move. They would have made a difference. But the biggest loss IMHO was the hobbled Bobby Orr who was a spectator as he recovered from yet another knee surgery. If Orr had played it would have been a different series.

 The Soviet team was really, really good, and Phil Esposito laughed years later about telling the boys on the bench to try not to run the score up too high on them. Canada went up 2-0 in the first but they were sweating and looked tired while the Russians were not even sweating yet. Throw in the fact that the Russians played together in all kinds of tournaments for years and years and the Canadian club practiced for a couple of weeks and had zero cohesion.

  IMHO one thing Sinden did wrong was he should have given the young Turks such as Dionne and Perreault a fair shake. Instead he played guys like Dennis Hull regularly and the kids sat and stewed, the Buffalo contingent actually went home in exasperation halfway through the tourney.

  Great subject matter Scott.

ScottM

Posted

@yave1964 I did include the officiating under gamesmanship I guess, though you are correct that it could have been another point. IIRC, in game five, the Canadians were whistled for 31 penalty minutes while the Soviets got four. Those were the officials that the Soviets were fighting to have in game eight. While I obviously don't condone Parise's near assault of an official, it's really not hard to understand his level of frustration.

 

I didn't want to disparage the Soviet team, because they were great, but I've long felt that the Canadian team doesn't get the credit due.

  • Like 1
BluPuk

Posted

Canada had been caught out for sure. When the series moved to Moscow, we had to win 3 of four games in their arena. On the big ice. With inferior and slanted officiating. With spearing, kicking, and butt-ending by the Soviets going uncalled. Everything was in their favor. Or was it? I can remember it like it was yesterday.  There were approximately 3000 Canada fans there but they sounded like 15000. I can still remember the looks on the faces of the Soviet fans, the officials, and even the Soviet players. They had never seen anything like it for sure; and it helped. 

It was the greatest hockey I ever witnessed still to this day. In the end we learned our lesson well, and for the Soviets - so did they. They were stunned. I have no doubt that the powers that were at that time in Moscow were completely convinced that their style of play could not be defeated. They were sure they were going to win and strike a blow for their political views. 

It still feels good today....:)

  • Like 1
yave1964

Posted

2 hours ago, BluPuk said:

Canada had been caught out for sure. When the series moved to Moscow, we had to win 3 of four games in their arena. On the big ice. With inferior and slanted officiating. With spearing, kicking, and butt-ending by the Soviets going uncalled. Everything was in their favor. Or was it? I can remember it like it was yesterday.  There were approximately 3000 Canada fans there but they sounded like 15000. I can still remember the looks on the faces of the Soviet fans, the officials, and even the Soviet players. They had never seen anything like it for sure; and it helped.

It was the greatest hockey I ever witnessed still to this day. In the end we learned our lesson well, and for the Soviets - so did they. They were stunned. I have no doubt that the powers that were at that time in Moscow were completely convinced that their style of play could not be defeated. They were sure they were going to win and strike a blow for their political views.

It still feels good today....:)

Yup, the 3000 fans screaming "Soviet!  Nyet, Nyet Nyet! cheering the boys on.

 

  Scott, what I meant was the officiating probably deserved its very own reason, as the gamesmanship off the ice, Espo wrote in Thunder and Lightning that the Rsukies stole half the food and beer as it came through from customs, that the KGB followed and intimidated the wives, that some players like Pete Mahovlich simply caved to the off ice pressure and it ruined their game. That is what I meant that Gamesmanship on/off the ice were two separate things, IMHO. Horrible officiating on, horrible treatment off. Wayne Cashman talked about breakfast being green rotten eggs with moldy bread on the morning of a game and because they were forced to ration the food they brought with them that most of the players skipped the pregame meal. He swore they were served horsemeat at one point by the kitchen help who stole the steaks that had come from Canada. Simply awful. Of course to many of these people living behind the Iron Curtain they had never seen Westerners and their ways and the chance to eat real food and drink something other than rotgut vodka was probably more than they could take. That is not counting what the KGB stole......

  • Like 1
ScottM

Posted

@yave1964 The more I think about it, the more I agree that those should have been separate points. I mentioned the 31-4 penalty minute advantage the Soviets had in game five above, and that alone could probably account for the Canadian loss in that game.

 

@BluPuk I think you're absolutely correct to credit the Canadian fans present in Moscow. There was a big difference between being booed off the ice in Vancouver after game four and hearing the cheers and singing of "O Canada" after game five. Did that give the team the boost needed to fight through all the garbage that they went through? Possibly, I'd say.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...