Jump to content
  • entries
    45
  • comments
    31
  • views
    29,193

A Few Trade Deadline Deals That Sent Teams To The Stanley Cup Finals.


Oilfield Jersey Cover 2

The trade deadline may not seem very significant at first considering that the NHL has the playoffs, draft and the all-star game. The trade deadline is more important than you may think because the outcome from the moves made by teams during that time can vary in extremes but the only thing that comes to mind as to why teams make key trades at that time. Because it’s the Stanley Cup. The media love to make a big deal out of it and it becomes more of a spectacle of entertainment more than anything and it’s sometimes hilarious watching the analysts making the trade announcements as dramatic as possible. But regardless, I admire they’re passion.

The choice between buying and selling at the deadline is easily made if you’re a team that’s contending (buying) and a teams that’s rebuilding (selling).

Then you have those bubble teams who are between 7th and 11th place give or take. A team has to be in 8th place or above to make the playoffs. Those teams that are on the bubble make the situation very interesting because the general managers for those teams now have a tough choice between buying and selling.

Remarkably, some of the teams that did buy as a bubble team went on to either go to the finals or win the Stanley Cup. It has happened a few times before and sometimes those trade acquisitions at the deadline paid huge dividends. What if those bold trade deadline moves weren’t made? What if a team decided to sell instead? A lot of general managers don’t like to sell if they’re a bubble team because if they decide to take that route, it would most likely mean that the rebuild would extend by 1 to 3 years. There’s always the odd case where there’s a nagging contract issue with a star player. The 2 parties might come at a wits end and no matter what team he’s playing on, most GM’s would opt to trade him to salvage what they can get back from him instead of letting him walk to free agency with nothing in return. Others keep that player in hopes of a deep playoff run but that has it’s own set of risks.

For the purposes of this list, we’re focusing on the trades that involved players that made a impact for the rest of that season and performed exceptionally well in the playoffs. Only one team per season will be counted on the list as well.

cup-topper.jpg

Edmonton Oilers trade their 1st and 3rd round picks to the Minnesota Wild for Dwayne Roloson on March 8th, 2006

When the 2006 Edmonton Oilers had to make the choice between buying and selling at the deadline, GM Kevin Lowe decided to aggressively buy despite the fact that the Oilers were in the middle of the standings. What made this trade so scary is that Roloson was just 6-17-1 with a GAA of 3.00 that season. That record alone is enough drive away most shoppers. But with Lowe taking the chance to acquire him, he made himself look like a genius. While the results didn’t pay off immediately for the rest of the season (8-7-5 record with .905 sv%) with Edmonton barely making the playoffs by taking the last seed. Roloson absolutely put on a tear in the playoffs with him and the Oilers beating the Detroit Red Wings (President’s Trophy Winners) in 6 games of the quarter finals. It shocked the hockey world.

Maybe they got lucky? Maybe they were onto something as the Oilers made victims of the San Jose Sharks and the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim in the semi-finals and conference finals respectively.

Roloson’s record for the first 3 rounds dramatically improved to 12-5-0 with a GAA of 2.33 and SV% of .927. That is a fantastic record considering how not so great his record was during the season.

Unfortunately for Roloson, he got injured in Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Finals against the Carolina Hurricanes and wasn’t able to return to the rest of the series. The Oilers would still go the distance against an aggressive Hurricanes team but ultimately falter in game 7 as the Canes won their first Stanley Cup in franchise history. Jussi Markkanen was the designated goaltender for the Oilers for the rest of the series. A lot of people have questioned if the Oilers would have won the Stanley Cup if Roloson didn’t get injured; We unfortunately will never know that fate.

mark_recchi_tribute_fans_in_each_of_his_

The Carolina Hurricanes trade Krystofer Kolanos, Niklas Nordgren, and a 2007 2nd round pick to the Pittsburgh Penguins for Mark Recchi on March 9th, 2006. (Day after Dwayne Roloson trade)

Recchi was a great high-scoring winger in the 1990’s and early 2000’s but he was a older player in 2006 and his production wasn’t what it used to be. It was still a great trade for Carolina to make because they didn’t pay that much to acquire him. Regardless, Recchi is a great leader on and off the ice and his leadership was needed to vault the Carolina Hurricanes to win their first Stanley Cup in franchise history.

Recchi totalled 7 points in 20 regular season games for the Hurricanes as well as contributing 16 points in 25 games and a lot of points came in critical moments during a few of their games which made him a clutch performer.

This trade deadline deal is not a prolific or exciting one but the value gained in leadership, delivering in critical moments while not giving any roster players from the trade is a damn good deal for the Canes.

5311.jpg

The Pittsburgh Penguins trade Erik Christensen, Colby Armstrong, Angelo Esposito and a 1st round pick to the Atlanta Thrashers for Pascal Dupuis and Marian Hossa on February 26th, 2008.

There was no doubt at that time that the Pittsburgh Penguins found their glory days again. It was the first time since the early 1990’s that the Penguins had a team that had two franchise players to build around in Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. With the Penguins acquiring Hossa, they ensured themselves they were getting a high-calibre two-way sniper. The Pens sure hit the mark in getting Hossa but he suffered an injury in his MCL on his first game as a Pen. Many thought he was going to be out for the rest of the season and the playoffs but luckily he returned to the line-up just a few weeks before the 2007-2008 regular season ended and he looked like he was still in top form as he scored 10 points during the final 12 games of the season.

With Hossa returning to the lineup, the Penguins ensured themselves that they were a powerhouse contender for the Stanley Cup. Pascal Dupuis was a great addition in the trade as well because him and Sidney Crosby had excellent chemistry playing together but it was Hossa who stepped up large in the playoffs that year. Hossa shook off the criticism of not performing in big games by registering 26 points including 14 goals in just 20 games during the 2008 Stanley Cup playoffs. It wasn’t enough as the Detroit Red Wings out-duelled the Penguins in the Stanley Cup Finals as the Wings won the Stanley Cup in 6 games.

The Pens not only won with the services of Hossa, they found long-term chemistry for Sidney Crosby as Pascal Dupuis stayed with the Penguins for the rest of his NHL career. Hossa went on to sign with the Red Wings for one year just after the Stanley Final loss. Ironically, the Red Wings would face the Penguins once again in the 2009 Stanley Cup Finals where the Penguins avenged last years loss by defeating the Red Wings in 7 games. Pascal Dupuis played a pivotal role in helping the Penguins win the cup and once again Hossa was on the losing side but this time with the Detroit Red Wings.

Hossa would more than make up for his losses by signing with the Chicago Blackhawks where he has won 3 Stanley Cup championships so far.

What the Atlanta Thrashers acquired in the trade with Hossa didn’t materialize into what they were expecting as Christensen and Armstrong didn’t develop into the players that the Thrashers were hoping. Also, highly touted 1st round pick, Angelo Esposito and their 1st round draft choice, Daultan Leveille didn’t even crack the NHL line up as both were considered draft busts just a few years.

GaborikResignDL.jpg

The Los Angeles Kings traded Matt Frattin, a 2nd round draft pick and a 3rd round draft pick to the Columbus Blue Jackets for Marian Gaborik on March 5th, 2014.

Unlike the 2012 Los Angeles Kings, who were considered underdogs, the 2014 Los Angeles Kings team were a known threat to other NHL teams then. But once again they still surprised many as they dominated in the playoffs.

During the 2012 trade deadline, the Kings acquired Jeff Carter from the Columbus Blue Jackets in exchange for Jack Johnson and a 1st round pick. It was a genius move by Kings GM Dean Lombardi as the Kings went on to win the Stanley Cup that season despite the fact that were 3 head coaching changes plus they barely made the playoffs as an 8th seed in the western conference.

The Jeff Carter trade was a great trade deadline deal for the Kings but the Marian Gaborik trade was a much better deal as he performed way better than Carter in their 2014 championship season plus the Kings gave up less for Gaborik than they did to get Carter.

Gaborik came from the Blue Jackets playing just a handful games because he was injured for the rest of the time. Gaborik finished the 2014 regular season with 16 points in 19 games which is pretty good. In the playoffs he was even better as Gaborik absolutely dominated by scoring 14 goals and mustering 22 points in 26 games. Once again, the Kings have won the Stanley Cup for the 2nd time in 3 years. Without Gaborik, I don’t think the Kings would have that kind of run to be honest.

This trade was also interesting because the Jeff Carter trade and the Marian Gaborik trade came from the hands of the Columbus Blue Jackets both times making themselves look foolish at their expense as the Kings made themselves look like geniuses. Maybe the Kings should get another deal with the Jackets again?

d4dccbf410bfc05025301337b46ec5db.jpg

The Colorado Avalanche trade Brian Rolston, Martin Grenier, Sammy Pahlsson, and a first-round draft pick to the Boston Bruins for Raymond Bourque and Dave Andreychuk on March 6th, 2000.

This was a trade that was led to believe that the Avalanche were going all in for the 1999-2000 season but the fruition of the trade didn’t transpire until the following season. The Avalanche landed Boston’s franchise defenceman of nearly 20 years who many thought was unmovable. Bourque comes in as an outsider but fit into the club right away as he scored 14 points in the final 14 games of the 1999-2000 regular season. The Avs once again were poised for a deep playoff run but in the conference finals against the Dallas Stars, they fell just short but in the meantime Bourque racked up 9 points in 13 playoff games. That’s incredible for a player that was 39 years old at the time.

When many thought it was going to be Bourque’s last season before retiring, Bourque signed a one year deal with the Colorado Avalanche in hopes of winning the Stanley Cup. It was an unexpected signing considering how long he has played in the NHL already, but his desire to win was stronger than his ability to say ‘”no” to hockey.

The following season, Bourque amassed 59 points in 80 games which is pretty impressive at the age of 40. Bourque established a strong leadership presence in the locker room and became an alternate captain. In the playoffs, Bourque once again made invaluable contributions towards sending the Avs to the 2001 Stanley Cup Final as he still defended well while still accumulating 10 points in 21 games. The Avs ultimately won the Stanley Cup against the reigning 2000 Stanley Cup champions, The New Jersey Devils.

A special moment in history was made right after the final moments of the last Stanley Cup Final game of 2001 was played. When NHL commissioner Gary Bettman handed the Stanley Cup to Joe Sakic, Sakic didn’t raise the Cup right away. Instead, he called over Ray Bourque to hoist it. It was a very classy move by Sakic as he knew Bourque waited 20 NHL seasons to win the Cup and he finally got his wish. It was a fairy tale ending to an illustrious and legendary career by none other than Raymond Bourque.

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

yave1964

Posted

I would disagree vehemently on Bourque, I am not saying he was a passenger but he certainly did not drive the train. The Avalanche would have won the cup with or without him. He should be grateful to the Avalanche, not the other way around.

  The trade deadline deal that all others are matched against and come up short of course was the Isles trading Lewis and Harris to the Kings for Butch Goring who was the perfect fit as a 2C for a team that was full of talent but needed veteran leadership.

  Larry Murphy booed out of Toronto and landing in Detroit was the perfect final piece for the Wings semi-dynasty.

 And not at the deadline but close enough, Ron Francis to the Penguins was legend.

 

J0e Th0rnton

Posted

8 hours ago, yave1964 said:

I would disagree vehemently on Bourque, I am not saying he was a passenger but he certainly did not drive the train. The Avalanche would have won the cup with or without him. He should be grateful to the Avalanche, not the other way around.

  The trade deadline deal that all others are matched against and come up short of course was the Isles trading Lewis and Harris to the Kings for Butch Goring who was the perfect fit as a 2C for a team that was full of talent but needed veteran leadership.

  Larry Murphy booed out of Toronto and landing in Detroit was the perfect final piece for the Wings semi-dynasty.

 And not at the deadline but close enough, Ron Francis to the Penguins was legend.

 

Wrong. The inclusion of Bourque enabled that team to play much more confidently up front and his breakout transition play drove the bus .

 

Sakic credits his best season ever with Bourque being back there making it all happen. Most of the team said the same before they won the cup. It was like having 24 better players

yave1964

Posted

On 2/29/2016 at 4:53 PM, J0e Th0rnton said:

Wrong. The inclusion of Bourque enabled that team to play much more confidently up front and his breakout transition play drove the bus .

 

Sakic credits his best season ever with Bourque being back there making it all happen. Most of the team said the same before they won the cup. It was like having 24 better players

Bourque as a deadline deal addition was an absolute failure, period, no discussion. to me a deadline deal that does not result in a cup that year cannot be considered one of the greatest ever. They won the following year, but that was the following year. does that mean that the Wings trading Coffey and Primeau for Shanahan in October deserves to be cosnidered a great deadline deal because they won that year? No. deadline deals have to result in a win that year for it to count. Bourque was an all time great, but not one of the all time great deadline deal winners.

  And gloss it over all you want, the year they won it he scored 4 goals and 10 points in 21 postseason games. That was a tired old man, the team won and would have won without him. Sakic was a superstar before the arrival of Bourque and was still one long after Raymond rode off into the sunset. I think your prejudice is showing.

J0e Th0rnton

Posted

8 minutes ago, yave1964 said:

Bourque as a deadline deal addition was an absolute failure, period, no discussion. to me a deadline deal that does not result in a cup that year cannot be considered one of the greatest ever. They won the following year, but that was the following year. does that mean that the Wings trading Coffey and Primeau for Shanahan in October deserves to be cosnidered a great deadline deal because they won that year? No. deadline deals have to result in a win that year for it to count. Bourque was an all time great, but not one of the all time great deadline deal winners.

  And gloss it over all you want, the year they won it he scored 4 goals and 10 points in 21 postseason games. That was a tired old man, the team won and would have won without him. Sakic was a superstar before the arrival of Bourque and was still one long after Raymond rode off into the sunset. I think your prejudice is showing.

Being able to convince Bourque to resign that one more year was contingent on getting him first. I get which direction you are coming from tho regarding not being able to call it a great "Deadline deal"

 

 

The idea that they would have won the cup with or without him is where you lose me. It is simply silly. That's like saying Lidstrom was completely inconsequential to the Wings 1997 and 2008 cup because he scored less. We both know Lidstrom' strong defensive play, shutting down top players, transition game and puck moving was crucial, regardless of whether he showed on the scoreboard or not. So say one, and you are agreeing Lidstrom was nothing and replaceable for 2 of his cups just because of his numbers.

 

 I watched every single game. Nothing tired about him.  Bourque played 29 minutes a night in the playoffs, in the toughest matchup's. He was one of the greatest defensive defensemen and puck moving transition game defensemen of all time. Playing on a team that strong enabled him to sit back and play that sort of game. Lidstrom was fortunate to have always been able to play that style because he was never the focus of attention on that super stacked team and had the guns in front of him to work with. In fact, Lidstrom was under appreciated for a long time because of that and only later did he get his due. In Boston, he had no choice but to activate offensively in a more gambling fashion when he was younger because Boston's best offense in an era of 130 point scorers were usually 70-80 point guys. By the time they got a 130 point guy in Oates, they lost all their depth and their best goal scorer. Boston's entire offense revolved around Bourque and his array of shots.

 

In Colorado, you got a glimpse of what Bourque could have done if Bruins management was not inept for so many years. Say what you will about Sakic. Those words came from his mouth not mine. It was one of the lowest scoring era's in recent memory and Sakic in the years around that was regularly scoring 80-90 points. The full year with Bourque, he cited Bourque's rock solid team boosting play and transition game with boosting him to his best season ever. Sakic's 118 point season was basically what would have been a 150 point season in the 80's and he owed much of it to Bourque.

 

Looking for Sakic's quote now as my Dad used to quote it all the time on the old boards. Only finding snippets from coaches, roenick, etc, but ill keep looking

 

Quote

"From Day 1, he made my job easier. It was like he brought a new energy into the locker room. And I knew he'd give me 30-plus minutes of quality defense each night. Finding a defenseman who can provide that is like finding gold."

"I came here for two reasons. I wanted to play for a team that had a chance to win a Stanley Cup. And I wanted to see how my game would measure up if I played for a better team. I learned that I could still play at that high level once I got here. Now all that's left is winning the Cup."

And the urgency is felt by every Avalanche player.

Offensive-minded before Bourque arrived, the Avalanche averaged 22 shots against per game with him in the lineup, compared with 29 per game in the pre-Bourque days.

"It was almost like adding 23 new players," defense partner Adam Foote says. "His poise, his confidence rubbed off on everybody. I think we all played a little like Ray after he arrived."

Others in the league noticed as well. "It's amazing how their confidence grew," Coyotes center Jeremy Roenick said at the end of last season. "Adam Foote grew into a rock playing alongside Ray, and the forwards clearly took more chances offensively knowing there's a Hall of Fame guy right behind them."

 

That and I know what I saw. Bourque on defense made that team as much better as Lidstrom on defense did for the wings. No question. Not even debatable. If Boston were as powerful as the stacked Wings and Aves team later were, Bourque likely has 5-6 cups instead of the one at the end.

 

Bourque is the greatest Dman of all time after Orr and that is a widely supported stance by a good percentage of the hockey community. Call it "prejudice" all you want.

 

yave1964

Posted

Joe,

 

I have no problem with your assessment of Bourque as the second greatest defenseman of all time, I say Lidstrom, you say Bourque, both were amazing, both were unique. Bourque was capable of doing things with the puck on his stick that Lidstrom could not and Lidstrom was arguably the greatest defensive defenseman of all time. They separated from the pack, they were truly all time greats. He was one of Bostons all time great players and a class act.

  I just think that his short time in Colorado has been romanticized and blown out of proportion.

  Colorado was an amazing team before he got there, always in the thick of it, Forsberg, Sakic, Roy all gone to the Hall. Lemeiux, Keane, so many great spear carriers. And Adam Foote was amazing on the back end, leading a very underrated defense.

  I hate the Avalanche from that era, it has only been in recent years that I have grudgingly learned to love to hate them, before it was a white hot hate that made my temples throb unlike any other hate for a team I have had before or since, so my bias surely is capable of clouding my judgement as surely as your love of the Bruins and of Bourque could cloud yours.

  As for the thin, narrow scope of the discussion, greatest deadline acquisitions ever, not even close. The Wings traded for Cheli at the deadline in 99 and won a cup in 2002 with him as a key component. Does that mean we need to rank him? Of course not. Great deadline cup acquisitions are the ones who get your team over the top that year, period. It did not happen. It was not Bourque's fault, the Stars were loaded that year and beat them in a fun, tough series.

  Was Bourque instrumental in the Avalanche winning the cup the following year? Did he play a key role? Of course and of course. I personally feel they would have won without him, the Wings were down, the Stars were tired after two straight cup finals, the Devils had an off year. The three teams to beat of that era not named Colorado were all off there game, leaving Colorado as the last giant standing. They would have won if Bourque had been there or not.

  He did show what he was capable of doing with brilliant players around him and I agree it is a shame that he did not play on a better team for most of his career. If you want to argue that he meant more to the Avlanche than I am giving credit for because of my intense hatred of everything Colorado of that era clouding my judgment I will say okay, maybe in 20 years I will revisit it and see if my hatred for the team has abated enough to give anyone on the team credit for much of anything. But.

 He was one hell of a player but as a deadline acquisition his team lost. End of story.

yave1964

Posted

My last word on the subject Joe,and then it is all yours, in 2002 the Devils traded popular Jason Arnott and a pick and a package for Jamie Langenbrunner and Joe Nieuwendyk. The Devils were shocked by losing in the first round in 5 games. The following year the Devils won a cup with Langenbrunner leading the league in postseason goals and Joe playing a key role.

  Was the deadline trade a success? IMHO emphatically no. Lots of players dealt at or around the deadline who lose that year but who play key roles a year or two later, I do not believe that qualifies.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...