Jump to content

toughfighter83

Member
  • Posts

    243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    New Jersey
  • Favorite Team
    Flyers

Recent Profile Visitors

1,212 profile views

toughfighter83's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

7

Reputation

  1. hahahaha, calling people names it's just the way for saying you just sucking up for the player
  2. no but they dont rely on deflection goals, lucic and bickel know how to score goals in crucial times in the playoffs where was hartnell in the devils series last year, if he was so great? john leclair was old but knows how to shoot for goals in the playoffs in the tampa series in 2004, hartnell is no leclair, he's just a another scrub, he has no speed, no skill to score goals, has to rely on team mates and defections just to get goals. i just think you believe hartnell is just good as leclair, bickell and lucic.
  3. i do agree about the defense and in goal but with screwing the development with schenn and courturier by signing vinny that doesnt screw it up, it only thing that screws them up is being sent them down to the ahl or trading them.
  4. no but as much i liked briere that's no denying the fact he has regressed and hartnell is not the same player that he was once was, he only had good one year because of jagr although in the playoffs he hasnt much of a difference maker. Simmonds is a better player than hartnell, he's younger and a better skater. hartnell is not a good skater that's why he's struggling, you have to face the fact he's not the same player.
  5. because great teams like chicago, boston, LA have speed and skill players that wins cups, they dont have players that rely on garage goals, that's not how you win because great defense teams can knock garbage players like hartnell off your skates.
  6. you are right on all points, chicago won the cup because of their speed which the flyers dont have, hartnell is a player that just cant skate, i would keep gagne and read over him, they have speed, get rid of hartnell and package him for a good defensive speedy player.
  7. if they sign gagne i would rather have gagne with giroux and Voracek gagne worked well with the richards line, he was the main reason why richards was good because of gagne. he could bring that same success with giroux.
  8. lol lol lol lol lol hahahahahaha
  9. im not set with this roster, defense is still a major problem, adding streit is good signing for offense but the defense needs to be fixed, there's no way any goalie will survive with this defense.
  10. doesnt salary need to be move, they cant go into the season being over the cap? im guessing they are going to sign more fa's before they move salary.
  11. im more worried that which goalie lavy is going to burn out when all hell breaks lose when the goalie struggles?
  12. and you wonder why those teams are so bad because they dont have the cap to spend the money on good role players, i cant care how great this guy or that guy is, if the player is just in it for the money and not winning the big one, then dont sign him, how to replace him, that's on the gm.
  13. best players in the nhl? compared to who crosby? ovie? i like giroux but if he's just staying just for money and doesnt produce, i wouldnt want to keep him, it's a big risk, plus a big cap hit, if you look at vinny he took less to play here, if giroux took less, than he seems like he wants to win rather than thinking about the money.
  14. i just dont like this deal because if giroux starts having problems down the road like concussions, wearing down like briere, we'll be stuck with his big cap hit and this team wont have the money to make changes. it's the reason why the islanders are so bad because of the big deals with rick dipietro, they dont have the money to make changes.
×
×
  • Create New...