blocker Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 A goal was scored that decided a tournament win. The placement of a face-off had a lot to do with the scoring of the winning goal. The officials were competent and respected. They were faced with an immediate, difficult decision.A delayed penalty was called against team White in team Blue's zone. Blue got the puck into White's end where a White player got another delayed penalty by charging a Blue. The Blue player retaliated with a cross-check and was whistled, still inside White's end.This is a USA-hockey sanctioned game. Where should the face-off have been after the whistle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 White team's end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blocker Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 White team's end.The officials agreed with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 The officials agreed with you.Yeah, but what the hell do they know? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanflyer Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 @Podein25That was my guess too. The later infractions were off-setting. Now if blue got an infraction during the delay of the white infraction, I am thinking it comes to the neutral zone. Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.