Podein25 Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Can't believe no thread on it yet.TSN has been showing the games and doing little mini-documentaries on it.Tonight 7:30 EDT, Game 8 where Paul "I'm Such a D-bag" Henderson" scores the winner.Clarkie will be on the TSN panel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyercanuck Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 I'm old enough to remember the series (barely). The one thing that's always bothered me is the way Clarke gets badmouthed now about his slash...OK, axe-swing, on Karmalov.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOMJsJhHlyMI don't recall a single person back in the cold war days saying anything bad about it. On the contrary, most people thought it was great. Threat of nuclear holocaust will have that effect. Now, all the "politically correct" douchebags say things like "he should be locked up for that". Ahhh shut up! Of course no mention is made of how Karlamov was penalized almost as much as Clarke in the series. And with those cheating commie refs, that's saying a lot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 @flyercanuck Agreed....was only a matter of time until the politically correct crowd sunk their teeth into the Clarke slash. That series, as many know, went far beyond hockey...it was our way of life against theirs...losing was not an option. Clarke maintains to this day "I did what I had to do" and "I'd do it again today, no problem"....I love that about Clarkie...never holds back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 I think it was cheap. Granted there was a lot cheap shots and things going on during this series. But I do think that was too far on Clarke's part. Canada should have been able to win on their own through creative play and just plain old good hockey instead of injuring the Soviets' star player just because they couldn't find an answer for him. No surprise that Clarke came from that team in Philadelphia that was full of criminals... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 @TretiakCCCP20 Welcome....we won, that is all that matters. I was in Grade 1 when that series happened. We stopped school to roll a tv in and watch that series, all the games that conflicted with school were watched in the classroom. Still remember the joy of Henderson's goal. Hugging friends, total elation, total joy....and the secure sense that our way of life was better than theirs. Still feel that way. How did you feel when Henderson scored? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyercanuck Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 @TretiakCCCP20 They may have been criminals, but they were our criminals. Welcome to the board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Thanks. I have to disagree. I've personally never liked the Flyers. I wasn't alive when Henderson scored honestly. That was 20 years before me. Looking at it now though I'd say the Soviet system was better even though Team Canada won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruxpin Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 I'd say the Soviet system was better even Just checking: are you referring to hockey here or way of life? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 @ruxpin No, I'm talking about hockey. Their government and social system was inferior to ours but their hockey system was better not by much but it was still better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 @TretiakCCCP20 Well, the society and hockey intermingled. The communist way of life was so that a young promising player would play for the Gov't/State and that was that. That was their only job, to get better at hockey, train day after day to win tournys for mother Russia. What do you think Gretzky or Lemieux, Bobby Orr, Maurice Richard..it goes on and on....would have been like, all playing with the very best of the very best Canada had to offer? The Russian kids considered it an honour to represent Russia, and it was engrained in them to think it was dishonorable to have any different attitude, around here, it's free choice....big difference. If a line of Gretzky, Lemieux and Yzerman trained day and night to destroy the competition, knew each others moves inside out, they would have been literally unstoppable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 (edited) Gretzky and Lemiuex weren't in the NHL yet and Maurice Richard was retired I believe. You can't take players from two different time periods and put them on the ice. Thats for a hipothetical situation, this is real. The reason why the Soviets were good was because they had been playing for so long together. You ever seen the movie Miracle? Kurt Russell who was playing the role of Herb Brooks said it best, "The reason all-star teams fail is because they rely solely on the individual's talent. The Soviet system focuses on the betterment of the team." The Soviet system worked. Just because it was so different than ours doesn't mean it is inferior. If you want to talk hipothetical then hear this. I guarantee that Tretiak would have been the best in the league at his position had he been allowed to play in the NHL especially in the 80's where goaltending was considered weak. Fuhr, Roy, Smith, and Hextall probably couldn't even be put in the same sentence with Tretiak had he played in the NHL. Edited September 16, 2013 by TretiakCCCP20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @TretiakCCCP20 I was using them as examples. I think it was rather obvious they were from different time periods. Regardless of the time period, the end result was the Russians practiced together for literally decades. The point is, if our best of any era got to play together for the time frame the Russians did, it would have never been close. The Russians existence centered around making one specific team the best. Our players had secular things to do, things freedom bring, like living life, taking care of elderly parents, being there for your daughters graduation rather than a game in Siberia. " If you want to talk hipothetical then hear this. I guarantee that Tretiak would have been the best in the league at his position had he been allowed to play in the NHL especially in the 80's where goaltending was considered weak. Fuhr, Roy, Smith, and Hextall probably couldn't even be put in the same sentence with Tretiak had he played in the NHL." Puff your chest out all you want. Your best ever LOST. Not only in the Summit Series, but in the 1980 Olympics, against a group of non professionals. Not only did he lose, he got pulled in those Olympics, cause he let in suspect goals. Real champs, they find a way to win those games. Tretiak was not fit to carry the jock strap of Ken Dryden or Bernie Parent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @TretiakCCCP20 This aint Russia buddy. You want to come into a new forum full of Flyer fans and make inflamatory remarks like "the Flyers were a bunch of criminals"....you get what you give around here. Show no respect you get it right back, sickle and hammer style...Tretiak choked in the big games, making him a LOSER!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @jammer2Its funny because during the NHL challenge cup in 1979 the Soviets completely dominated the NHL All-Stars. The final game Tretiak didn't even play in and they kicked the crap out the NHL stars 6-0. Yeah, the Soviets were a totally big joke. I remember seeing the Soviets play the Canadiens in 76 I believe and the game ended in a 3-3 tie. The Canadiens had 37 shots on Tretiak and the Soviets had 13 on the Canadiens. Should have been a blow out but it wasn't. Not to mention Tretiak and Kharlamov are the only two players to be elected to the Hockey Hall of Fame in Toronto to never play a game in the NHL. And the Flyers are a bunch of thugs. At least they use to be. They bullied themselves to the top in 74 and 75 and people call them heroes. Its a disgrace to hockey as a sport to see a team like that be praised. The Oilers dynasty is a team that should be looked up to on the other hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @jammer2 The point of a forum is to debate. Not get mad over it fyi... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yave1964 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 okay, this is in my wheelhouse, a few points. The Soviets caught the Canadians off guard with their speed and system. Bobby Hull, J.C. Tremblay, Derek Sanderson and Cheevers were all not allowed to participate because they had signed with the WHA. Bobby Orr was out with his knee injuries. With a healthy Orr and the participation of Hull, ect.. it would have been a forgotten, Canadian victory, six or seven games won easily. Easily. The USSR had trained all year long for this event, the Canadian players were breaking camp in an era when most showed up looking to work off the 'beer weight' they had put on over the summer. If this had been held during the regular season when the Canadian players were at peak form with or without Hull, Orr, ect.. it would have been a no brainer. No disrespect to the USSR, some great players and a team playing a collective team game, but the scenario that played out, players out of game shape, no Orr, no Hull ect..was the perfect storm, if the Soviets could not win under those conditions there was none they ever would be able to win in. Russian hockey had gained and deserves to be remembered for it, Anatoli Tarasov was a God in the hockey world and deserves belated recognition for such, but the series was only close because of the things I mentioned. Any other scenario tilts it towards a blowout, huge win for Canada. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @jammer2 The point of a forum is to debate. Not get mad over it fyi... Your second post ever slags the Flyers, branding them criminals? How is that debate? That is an inflammatory comment meant to incite. You slag my team, I responded in kind to yours, no biggie. Why do you hate the Flyers? Was there any specific incident that lead to this? Do you happen to know Tretiak's record against the Flyers? A club team, not an all star team, just a group of players that represented Philadelphia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyercanuck Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @TretiakCCCP20 The Soviet system was better? They'd played together since birth (ok slight exaggeration), while the Canadians were coming off a summer of fishing and drinking (no exaggeration) and Canada still won. And Tretiak was a very good goalie at times....hardly the best ever. Roy couldn't be put in the same sentence as Tretiak? I'm not a fan of Patrick Roy the person, but that comment throws your credibility out the window. Maybe the best money goalie of alltime. If he's not, he's certainly in the discussion. If the Summit Series was 20 years before your time, what are you basing your Tretiak/Soviet love in on. highlights? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @flyercanuck Tretiak is at least top three. If you had read what I said I actually said that had Tretiak been allowed into the NHL goalies like Roy wouldn't be able to be put into the same sentance as him. The fact that Tretiak didn't play however, leaves that one up for debate. Honestly, I'd put Tretiak at number 2 to ever play in front of a net. Number 1 is probably Brodeur because he has like every record a goalie could possibly get and the guy has been playing like forever. Tretiak is like my idol. He played during a time that Canada had a serious ego problem and believed they were the undisputed hockey gods and that they would crush the Soviets. That series was so close nobody could be called a loser if you look at it. They were both on equal playing ground. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @jammer2 The Flyers in the 70's played dirty hockey and dragged the game of hockey through the mud to win the cup twice. The Flyers in my opinion have the worst fans also (Almost all pro sports fans of Philly are loud, ignorant, and obnoxious in my experience). I've just never had anything great that I've experienced seeing that team play. Went a Minnesota game once and all the Philly fans were such hooligans I wanted to punch them in the face. And its easy to win against a team like the Soviets when your team advocates putting out hits on enemy players, throwing cheap shots, and playing downright dirty hockey instead of trying to beat them with skill. Like I said, the Oilers dynasty is an NHL team I admire because they won on pure skill and talent and good hockey. Messier, Gretzky, Coffey, Kurri, and McSorely just to name a few. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @TretiakCCCP20 Since you were to young, maybe you need a refresher on the Flyers/Red Army game....enjoy!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @yave1964 Excellent points on Hull and Orr not being there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @jammer2 Neither side had their very best on the ice within that series. Not just your "perfect" Canadians...And you basically just proved my point with that video when I said they won on dirty play, cheap shots, and taking out enemy players with the intent to injure. I mean god forbid if you are a Flyers player you are actually taught to use skill and trained to perfect your skills but no in the 70's if you were a Flyers player and you met a team that was better conditioned, better prepared, and just could plain out play you then you resort to "dirty hockey". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TretiakCCCP20 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 (edited) Funny thing is I don't need to provide a video to show how since those two Stanley Cups in the 70's the Flyers haven't won it since Edited September 17, 2013 by TretiakCCCP20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyercanuck Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 @flyercanuck Tretiak is at least top three. If you had read what I said I actually said that had Tretiak been allowed into the NHL goalies like Roy wouldn't be able to be put into the same sentance as him. The fact that Tretiak didn't play however, leaves that one up for debate. Honestly, I'd put Tretiak at number 2 to ever play in front of a net. Number 1 is probably Brodeur because he has like every record a goalie could possibly get and the guy has been playing like forever. Tretiak is like my idol. He played during a time that Canada had a serious ego problem and believed they were the undisputed hockey gods and that they would crush the Soviets. That series was so close nobody could be called a loser if you look at it. They were both on equal playing ground. How can you put Tretiak top 3 when he never played in the best league in the world? Pretty hard to compare when his team went around beating a bunch of alsorans in a communist country. He basically played on a professional team that pretended to be amateurs so they could annihalate all comers. Great sportsmanship. I thought he looked good. So did Jiri Dopita until he played in the NHL. Or Krutov. Or Bryan Fogarty. Etc. Etc. Etc. Canada had a serious ego problem? LOL. I'll leave it at that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.