Jump to content

Locked-out NHL players not taking the long view.


Recommended Posts

This is an interesting article from an un-likely source, Sam C....

Anyone who has read my opinions on the lockout knows that I'm kinda on the players side. However, I also understand that the owners OWN their teams and they are the boss, period. My problem with the owners is that they made the salary mess and allowed the NHL to make bad long term bad investments (Phoenix/Columbus Ect...). Now that it has become obvious they want the players to pay for the owner's mistakes while at the same time monkeying around with whats considered HRR... But they are the boss. Yes they should honor those contracts in my opinion, if for no other reason than to feel the pain, take their medecine and learn not to do it again. However, we all know that when the new CBA is in place that the Sniders of the world will find a whole new set of loop holes and throw whatever money they are allowed to all OVER the place. Yes, me, a huge Flyers fan is ripping on Snider because I KNOW he will do this, again...

6 years down the road the owners will be crying poor.

Well, no wonder.... Bryz is making 1250% MORE than when he started. Read on and you might just not feel as bad for the players. But the article does illustrate the difference in a player like Walker/Lilja or a Briere/Hartnell... That my friends could be the achilles heel of the PA...

Inside the Flyers: Locked-out NHL players not taking the long view.

Sam Carchidi

NHL players need to have a different perspective as they battle the men who have made them very rich.

But before delving into the specifics of that statement, let's look at where we are: The owners and players are locked in a labor stalemate that has caused the cancellation of all games through Nov. 30, with the Winter Classic and All-Star Game next on the chopping block.

There is plenty of blame to spread around. On both sides.

At the center of the so-sad-it's-comical dispute is (what else?) finding an equitable way to divide the money.

When both sides recently said they had arrived at the supposed magic number - a 50-50 split of hockey-related revenue (HRR) - the NHL responded with its best Keith Jackson impersonation.

"Whoa, Nellie!"

At which point, NHL representatives stormed out of the room, a mere 15 minutes after turning down the proposal from Donald Fehr and the players' union.

The NHL said the union's proposal was superficial. In essence, it gives the players 56.7 percent of the HRR in the first year because the union doesn't want any money paid through future escrow installments.

And so, we have been waiting for both sides to make another move.

And waiting.

And waiting.

The NHL's proposal includes a "make whole" provision that would pay players their full salaries, with some of the payments deferred through escrow and funded by future player earnings. The NHLPA doesn't want that money coming from other players down the road.

And so more games have been canceled, and a shortened season will forever stain (read: cheapen) the record books. That is, assuming there is some sort of season.

Lost in all this waiting, all this posturing, is the fact that even if the players do lose 12 percent compared with the last CBA's revenue split - again, the NHL says that won't be the case - most of them will easily make that up in their next contracts.

The players, owners of an average salary of $2.5 million, need to understand that not only will they make up the 12 percent, but, based on recent history, they will surpass their salaries by percentages that could reach the hundreds.

Take the team that hopes to again play at the Wells Fargo Center, for instance. Excluding injured players, here are the current Flyers who were playing during the 2004-05 lockout - none were in Philadelphia at the time - and some of their salary highlights since then:

Danny Briere. The diminutive center earned $1.6 million the season before the 2004-05 lockout. Briere made $5 million two years later, a 212 percent increase. Now he is on a deal that averages $6.5 million per year, a 306 percent increase since the other lockout.

Kimmo Timonen. The veteran defenseman earned $2 million in the season before the 2004-05 lockout. He is finishing a six-year, $38 million contract that averages $6.3 million per season, a 215 percent increase since his first lockout.

Scott Hartnell. The left winger earned $1.2 million in the season before the 2004-05 lockout. His salary gradually increased before he signed two long-term deals with the Flyers. The last one, a six-year pact that runs through 2018-19, averages $4.75 million per season - a 296 percent increase since the previous lockout.

Ruslan Fedotenko. He earned $950,000 in the season before the 2004-05 lockout. Three years later, he was earning $2.9 million, a 205 percent increase. The well-traveled winger now earns $1.75 million, which is an 84 percent increase since his first lockout.

Jody Shelley. The enforcer earned $600,000 during the season before the 2004-05 work stoppage and has received gradual increases along the way. He now earns $1.2 million - a 100 percent increase since his first lockout.

Andreas Lilja. A spare defenseman, he earned $600,000 in the season before the 2004-05 lockout. Two years later, he was earning $1 million, a 40 percent increase. He now earns $727,000, a 21 percent increase from the first lockout.

Some Flyers weren't NHL regulars yet during the 2004-05 lockout, including goalie Ilya Bryzgalov and defenseman Andrej Meszaros.

Bryzgalov's first full NHL season was in 2005-06, when he earned $456,000. Three years later, he was making $4 million, a 777 percent increase. He now is on a nine-year deal that averages $5.7 million, a 1,250 percent increase over his initial contract.

Meszaros made $982,400 in his first year (2005-06) and now averages $4 million per season, an increase of 307 percent.

No one is begrudging the players their salary gains over the years. They are getting paid whatever the market bears. Good for them.

But when their union leader complains about money's being deferred - or taken from future players - they need to look at the whole picture and take that new perspective to the bargaining table.

Listening, Mr. Fehr?

Didn't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...