Jam1986 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 On Hockey writers our two first for the 4th pick! I say no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 On Hockey writers our two first for the 4th pick! I say noOnly if the Leafs take Vinny and Strome is still there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly29 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 No way I do that if I am the Flyers no way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yave1964 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Ooof, I don't know, it depends on how badly you want Strome or Hanifin. Obviously it would only be done if you are targeting a particular player, I gotta think it would be one of those two. Both could possibly step into the lineup this season and produce. Steep price to pay but sometimes you gotta role the dice..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruxpin Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Ooof, I don't know, it depends on how badly you want Strome or Hanifin. Obviously it would only be done if you are targeting a particular player, I gotta think it would be one of those two. Both could possibly step into the lineup this season and produce. Steep price to pay but sometimes you gotta role the dice..... The perfect post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly29 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Even though I am not a fan of the potential trade, if they did proceed with it I would love to see them get Strome with the 4th. Then trade B.Schenn and Laughton for high draft picks. Giroux, Strome, and Coots up the middle sounds good to me Also the Flyers would have to make the Leafs take some salary back there way with the likes of VLC or Mcdud included in the trade like Podein said earlier. I like Hanifin and I would possibly take him over Strome if only he were a right handed shot. We need more righties on the defense now and in the future. I would venture to guess the Flyers could get a mid to late 1st round pick for both B.Schenn and Laughton each this year am I correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polaris922 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Even though I am not a fan of the potential trade, if they did proceed with it I would love to see them get Strome with the 4th. Then trade B.Schenn and Laughton for high draft picks. Giroux, Strome, and Coots up the middle sounds good to me Also the Flyers would half to make the Leafs take some salary back there way with the likes of VLC or Mcdud included in the trade like Podein said earlier.I like Hanifin and I would possibly take him over Strome if only he were a right handed shot. We need more righties on the defense now and in the future.I would venture to guess the Flyers could get a mid to late 1st round pick for both B.Schenn and Laughton each this year am I correct?I don't see the Leafs absorbing VLC when they're trying to get rid of problems, not gain more. I also don't see them giving up anything more than the fourth pick for your two.Laughton is not worth a first round pick. And in fairness Schenn has shown himself to be a question mark. He's still developing but if you were a GM would you trade your first rounder for him as is?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruxpin Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 He's still developing but if you were a GM would you trade your first rounder for him as is? Maybe for Schenn and just two of those really good pucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FD19372 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Maybe for Schenn and just two of those really good pucks.Nah, throw in a "glo-puck". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly29 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 @Polaris922 Hence the reason why I said I would not do it unless the terms are agreed upon. Also since you think my trades are ridiculous you don't think giving up a 7th overall and a 30th overall for a 4th overall isn't??? At least without any type of conditions included in the trade like absorbing salary from dead weight? Also why couldn't we get two 1st rd picks for Laughton and Schenn they themselves were 1st rd picks. Yes I think there are teams out there that would pay that price that's why I said a mid to low 1st round pick for each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ8812 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 @Polaris922 Hence the reason why I said I would not do it unless the terms are agreed upon. Also since you think my trades are ridiculous you don't think giving up a 7th overall and a 30th overall for a 4th overall isn't??? At least without any type of conditions included in the trade like absorbing salary from dead weight? Also why couldn't we get two 1st rd picks for Laughton and Schenn they themselves were 1st rd picks. Yes I think there are teams out there that would pay that price that's why I said a mid to low 1st round pick for each. Laughton hasnt shown anything to say he was even worth the 1st round choice. The good thing is, he's still young. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam1986 Posted June 14, 2015 Author Share Posted June 14, 2015 Also No to Kessel!!!!!! Laughton should be trade bait at draft cause he will only be up and down all year. If they trade someone else to open a spot then get a pick or young d/man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillygrump Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 I'd trade 7 and 30 to move up to 3 or 4. If they think either Strome or Hanafin are game changers and won't be available at 7 why not move up? Rather have one great player than one really good player and another pretty good player. That's essentially what you're gauging right?Is Strome a great player? Is Marner? Is Hanafin?I think Hextall believes one of them is. Why not go for it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ8812 Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Nothing wrong with that. Don't forget, he should have never been in Philadelphia last year. He should have spent the year in Lehigh Valley to develop his offensive game. That one's on Hextall. playing 30 games in the NHL as a 20 year old should not ruin his development Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Force Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 If they are looking at a trade like that, play the game with the Coyotes. They can take some salary. Give them Lecavalier or MacDonald, or both, and the #7 for the #3 pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murraycraven Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 If they are looking at a trade like that, play the game with the Coyotes. They can take some salary. Give them Lecavalier or MacDonald, or both, and the #7 for the #3 pick. you're going to have to sweeten the deal a heck of a lot more for the yotes to take that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FD19372 Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 The correct answer and trade is Vinny and MacDonald for the Leafs 3rd round pick. Do it Hexy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murraycraven Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 The correct answer and trade is Vinny and MacDonald for the Leafs 3rd round pick. Do it Hexy. throw in RJ and it could work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Knut Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Laughton is not worth a first round pick. And in fairness Schenn has shown himself to be a question mark. He's still developing but if you were a GM would you trade your first rounder for him as is?? i might trade a middle 1st for both Laughton and Schenn.You get two guys that had probably about the same potential as whoever you'd draft in the late teens this year who are both ready to play now, no waiting two years to see. Also, It doesnt matter if it's Schenn, Laughton, VLC or MacDonald, any of them will be extremely more productive on a new team than they were the last two seasons in Philly. Count on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Knut Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 you're going to have to sweeten the deal a heck of a lot more for the yotes to take that deal. I'd still consider it with Schenn or Laughton thrown in. The Coyotes have A LOT of roster spots to fill. Hell I'd consider it with both Schenn and Laughton thrown in if the yotes gave us another pick or two....and before we get too precious about Schenn and Laughton, Just think of what Hextall could do with 13 million extra dollars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter puck Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 7,60,McDud,Laughton for 3 and 63 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radoran Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruxpin Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 I just stay at seven. We've actually got a decent stable being put together. Just continue to add to it. Stick with the patience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92WickedHockey Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Only if the Leafs take Vinny and Strome is still there.I'm afraid the days of the Leafs taking over the hill past their prime players is long gone, the Leafs will be an even worse team next year I think they have finally embraced the full rebuild for once. The only way the Leafs are giving up their 4th is if Giroux is one of the guys coming back and that is obviously not ever happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polaris922 Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 i might trade a middle 1st for both Laughton and Schenn.You get two guys that had probably about the same potential as whoever you'd draft in the late teens this year who are both ready to play now, no waiting two years to see.Also, It doesnt matter if it's Schenn, Laughton, VLC or MacDonald, any of them will be extremely more productive on a new team than they were the last two seasons in Philly. Count on it.I could see MAYBE a mid to late first for the two of them. I'll agree with that as a slim possibility. @Philly29Because neither of them has really stood out as worth the first round selection against a deep draft like this one. They're young enough that they may flourish yet, but if you were saying both for one middle to late round pick I'd say maybe. But each for a first rounder? I don't think so. ESPECIALLY when we're talking going for a top five pick in a draft like this. Now is the 7+30 for a 4 crazy? Not so much. If a franchise has their eyes on a player expected to go around the 7 and they could get a 30th too? They might risk it. But you're not trading up those with a VLC as a side saddle, he actually hurts the deal at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.