You're comparing a loaded LA team and loaded Chicago team to the Flyers?
This team's fortunes (at least offensively) will rise and fall due in large part with how well he plays. He cannot have another year like the last two at 5v5 if they are going to improve (at least offensively). Teams like Chicago and LA were able to survive "down years" from their respective captains. This team is not able to that, even if everyone is playing to their capability. It simply does not have eno
Not to be accused of enjoying feeling bad, but am I understanding correctly that the argument is actually being propagated that the Flyers will do fine even if Giroux doesn't play any better than he has the last two years?
*IF* that's the case, that's simply astounding.