hobie Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 This team has tied TO's greatest point accumulation ever, 103 points, TO hasn't won the Cup in 51 years but there have been some pretty decent teams over the years. When I think of the Gilmour years, the Sittler years, the Quinn years in particular I remember very good teams but I guess it's possible this team is superior to them. It's hard to believe that a 2 year rebuilt team could be better. TO will be playing the last seed in the East NJ on Wednesday and they have been playing well lately. They're 7-2-1 so they've earned the right to be in the playoffs. They're another team like TO last year that went young and managed to improve significantly meanwhile a team like Edmonton tried to experience up, age up and actually regressed. TO's better teams from the past were usually older, full of experience players yet this team that is basically young in it's superior talent, is there a lesson to be learned here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.