Jump to content
News Ticker
  • News Around the NHL

Ducks Hockey Forum Coyotes Hockey Forum Bruins Hockey Forum Sabres Hockey Forum Flames Hockey Forum Hurricanes Hockey Forum Blackhawks Hockey Forum Avalanche Hockey Forum Blue Jackets Hockey Forum Stars Hockey Forum Red Wings Jackets Hockey Forum Oilers Hockey Forum Panthers Hockey Forum Kings Hockey Forum Wild Hockey Forum Canadiens Hockey Forum Predators Hockey Forum Devils Hockey Forum Islanders Hockey Forum Rangers Hockey Forum Senators Hockey Forum Flyers Hockey Forum Penguins Hockey Forum Sharks Hockey Forum Blues Hockey Forum Lightning Hockey Forum Maple Leafs Hockey Forum Canucks Hockey Forum Golden Knights Hockey Forum Capitals Hockey Forum Jets Hockey Forum

vis

Moves Starting?

Recommended Posts

I can see the Leafs offering up something like Nylander and Liljegren for Pietrangelo maybe.

 

Leafs need D help bad and may want to go for it this year with new deals looming for Matthews, Marner, Kapanen and Gardiner.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, flyer4ever said:

How is it that the softest, least physical team in the league has the 3rd most power plays allowed? 

 

Because you have free roam in the Flyers zone and i ain't talking about a cell phone signal..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ruxpin

 

Since i proposed this in the Blues thread i will bring to the Flyers thread...

 

Ok so since i read that Tarasenko is on the table i will play....

 

Vladimir Tarasenko

Colton Parayko

Tyler Bozak

 

for 

 

Jake Voracek

Shayne Gostisbehere

Wayne Simmonds

 

Thoughts??

 

28 Claude Giroux - 14 Sean Couturier- 91 Vladimir Tarasenko
25 James van Riemsdyk -19 Nolan Patrick - 11 Travis Konecny
21 Scott Laughton
- 27 Tyler Bozak - 12 Michael Raffl 
23 Oskar Lindblom - 24 Misha Vorobyev - 22 Dale Weise

9 Ivan Provorov - 55 Colton Parayko
8 Robert Hägg- 3 Radko Gudas
6 Travis Sanheim - 26 Christian Folin

41 Anthony Stolarz
37 Brian Elliott

 

 

Would you rather swap out Pietrangelo for Parayko??

 

He injured though and more than likely needs surgery.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said:

@ruxpin

 

Well the trade freeze is December 19th does something go down before then???

 

Hidden Content

    Give reaction or reply to this topic to see the hidden content.

Yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OccamsRazor said:

@ruxpin

 

Since i proposed this in the Blues thread i will bring to the Flyers thread...

 

Ok so since i read that Tarasenko is on the table i will play....

 

Vladimir Tarasenko

Colton Parayko

Tyler Bozak

 

for 

 

Jake Voracek

Shayne Gostisbehere

Wayne Simmonds

 

Thoughts??

 

28 Claude Giroux - 14 Sean Couturier- 91 Vladimir Tarasenko
25 James van Riemsdyk -19 Nolan Patrick - 11 Travis Konecny
21 Scott Laughton
- 27 Tyler Bozak - 12 Michael Raffl 
23 Oskar Lindblom - 24 Misha Vorobyev - 22 Dale Weise

9 Ivan Provorov - 55 Colton Parayko
8 Robert Hägg- 3 Radko Gudas
6 Travis Sanheim - 26 Christian Folin

41 Anthony Stolarz
37 Brian Elliott

 

 

Would you rather swap out Pietrangelo for Parayko??

 

He injured though and more than likely needs surgery.

 

i would keep parayko, roster looks good accept for the goalie and coach, if that gets solved, it's a cup contender, actually if they managed to get both parayko and pietrangelo, that would be icing on the cake.

Edited by flyersfan35
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, flyercanuck said:

 

 Of course age matters...trading picks/prospects for old guys with a year or two left in them just so we can have a 1st round playoff exit makes ZERO sense to me. I could even care a less if we make it TWO rounds. 

 

 The goal, to me, is the cup. I don't care if it takes 5 or 8 years. That's the goal. A playoff round or two means diddly-squat to me.

the goal is to win now and not wait for another 8 years because of giroux and jake is not getting any younger, if you want to wait another 8 years then blow it up, it makes no sense to keep anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, flyersfan35 said:

the goal is to win now and not wait for another 8 years because of giroux and jake is not getting any younger, if you want to wait another 8 years then blow it up, it makes no sense to keep anyone.

 

I don't want to wait 8 years...I just want to win a cup...not a playoff round. This team needs a goalie...Hart is likely a few years away from being an NHL starter, if ever. Our D sure as heck isn't cup contender worthy as of now. Neither is our depth at forward.

 

That's a lot of pieces needed to "win now". 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OccamsRazor said:

@ruxpin

 

Since i proposed this in the Blues thread i will bring to the Flyers thread...

 

Ok so since i read that Tarasenko is on the table i will play....

 

Vladimir Tarasenko

Colton Parayko

Tyler Bozak

 

for 

 

Jake Voracek

Shayne Gostisbehere

Wayne Simmonds

 

Thoughts??

 

28 Claude Giroux - 14 Sean Couturier- 91 Vladimir Tarasenko
25 James van Riemsdyk -19 Nolan Patrick - 11 Travis Konecny
21 Scott Laughton
- 27 Tyler Bozak - 12 Michael Raffl 
23 Oskar Lindblom - 24 Misha Vorobyev - 22 Dale Weise

9 Ivan Provorov - 55 Colton Parayko
8 Robert Hägg- 3 Radko Gudas
6 Travis Sanheim - 26 Christian Folin

41 Anthony Stolarz
37 Brian Elliott

 

 

Would you rather swap out Pietrangelo for Parayko??

 

He injured though and more than likely needs surgery.

 

 

sign me up.... although, I would think the Blues would want a lot more added.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, murraycraven said:

I would think the Blues would want a lot more added.

 

Why?

 

Jake 29

Vlad 27

 

Ghost 25 

Parayko 25

 

Simmer 30

Bozak 32

 

So the age evens out.

 

And i am not going to get into all the trading Farabees and Frost hell no it is take it or leave it for them for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said:

 

Why?

 

Jake 29

Vlad 27

 

Ghost 25 

Parayko 25

 

Simmer 30

Bozak 32

 

So the age evens out.

 

And i am not going to get into all the trading Farabees and Frost hell no it is take it or leave it for them for me.

 

I just don't think Jake for Vlad is a good move for the Blues.   The guy is arguably one of the best snipers in the game.   Simmer would be a potential rental for the Blues.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, murraycraven said:

 

I just don't think Jake for Vlad is a good move for the Blues.   The guy is arguably one of the best snipers in the game.   Simmer would be a potential rental for the Blues.    

 

Ok how about this:

 

Jake, Simmer, Ghost

 

O'Reilly, Perron, Parakyo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said:

 

Ok how about this:

 

Jake, Simmer, Ghost

 

O'Reilly, Perron, Parakyo

I like Vlad better!  LOL...

 

At this point that isn't all that bad!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, murraycraven said:

I like Vlad better!  LOL...

 

At this point that isn't all that bad!

 

tenor.gif

 

 

I would like this better but not sure if the Blues would...

 

 

Jake, Simmer, Ghost

 

for

 

O'Reilly, Schwartz, Parakyo

 

Huh?

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said:

 

Ok how about this:

 

Jake, Simmer, Ghost

 

O'Reilly, Perron, Parakyo

 

It sounds like St. Louis is ready to tear it down... and if that's the case, then this trade doesn't really make any sense for them. Parayko and Ghost are a wash, and Voracek has a worse contract and doesn't score nearly as many goals as Tarasenko does. 

 

I can almost guarantee that St. Louis wants a 1st round pick in any move for a guy like VT. 

 

I'm sure they would take Simmer, Frost, and a 1st. Neither player and the pick alone would be enough, is my guess. 

 

EDIT: Sorry, I was replying to your previous post with VT and Parayko and Bozak. 

 

 

Edited by brelic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, brelic said:

 

I can almost guarantee that St. Louis wants a 1st round pick in any move for a guy like VT. 

 

Yeah no way i would include a pick this year with the chance it could be top 3.

 

I would with the prospect coffers full trade one this year if it is lottery protected like they did to us.

 

However the whole trade would need to be tweaked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, brelic said:

I'm sure they would take Simmer, Frost, and a 1st.

 

For just Tarasenko? Or Jake included?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, brelic said:

 

It sounds like St. Louis is ready to tear it down... and if that's the case, then this trade doesn't really make any sense for them. Parayko and Ghost are a wash, and Voracek has a worse contract and doesn't score nearly as many goals as Tarasenko does. 

 

I can almost guarantee that St. Louis wants a 1st round pick in any move for a guy like VT. 

 

I'm sure they would take Simmer, Frost, and a 1st. Neither player and the pick alone would be enough, is my guess. 

 

EDIT: Sorry, I was replying to your previous post with VT and Parayko and Bozak. 

 

 

I would do that deal just to get rid of the Vorastank from this team, and his floating laziness. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said:

 

For just Tarasenko? Or Jake included?

 

For just Tarasenko. I don't think SImmer and a 1st or Frost and a 1st do it. 

 

I mean, the guy is 26 years old, has a reasonable long-term contract at $7.5M, and 4 straight 30+ goal seasons (including 40 in one of them).

 

If we had that guy, would you trade him for Simmer or Frost and a 1st? I'd be mighty disappointed if we made that trade.

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, brelic said:

 

For just Tarasenko. I don't think SImmer and a 1st or Frost and a 1st do it. 

 

I mean, the guy is 26 years old, has a reasonable long-term contract at $7.5M, and 4 straight 30+ goal seasons (including 40 in one of them).

 

If we had that guy, would you trade him for Simmer or Frost and a 1st? I'd be mighty disappointed if we made that trade.

 

 

 

I really don't want to trade Frost.

 

So you're saying the RW would be this???

 

Tarasenko

Voracek

Konecny????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, brelic said:

I don't think SImmer and a 1st or Frost and a 1st do it. 

 

If the pick is protected i would be more open to do it...i don't want to miss out on Hughes or Kakko...

 

 

Mikko Rantanen 2.0!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said:

 

I really don't want to trade Frost.

 

So you're saying the RW would be this???

 

Tarasenko

Voracek

Konecny????

 

Yes, but I would expect not for very long. If we get another huge contract like Tarasenko, you gotta think Voracek is a goner. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, brelic said:

 

Yes, but I would expect not for very long. If we get another huge contract like Tarasenko, you gotta think Voracek is a goner. 

 

Since you were seeking a veteran for the defense i would like a guy who will add some sandpaper too.

 

So i wouldn't mind going after Josh Manson from the Ducks. A right hand shot. Not young however not old just turned 27.

 

Under contract for 3 more years after this one at 4.1 mill.

  • Good Post 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OWhy would LA trade Doughty? They may need to rebuild, but a top pairing, top 3 in the league RD is something you don't trade. Burn everything else down, but that's possibly the most rare thing in the NHL.

 

Anaheim traded Theodore to keep themselves from losing Manson.

 

Trouba would be the best potential pickup, but he wants a big deal, and it would have to be an impressive return for Winnipeg to move him in season.

 

I just don't think that if/when Fletcher acquires someone, we're going to be too excited about who it is.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Most Liked Posts in This Topic

    • 6
      Post
      Just avoid 4-way stops and you'll be ok. We're so polite, it ends up basically being just 4 parked cars.    
    • 5
      Post
      You're not wrong. It does appear to be a solid roster to work with. On paper, I think most would say it doesn't seem like a line up that should require very much to be very good.   And yet, it really hasn't been good. It was saved last year largely because of one guy, and so far this season the roster is floundering and showing itself largely incapable of stringing together more than one decent period a game at best. And that's despite the same one guy who is still playing very high ca
    • 5
      Post
      If the Flyers trade Konecny I will not be responsible for what Mrs Podein25 might do. She's a huge Konecny fan. And a viking. Don't **** with vikings!!
    • 4
      Post
      I would ask, to what end? So that we can finish just outside of the playoffs and get a mid-round pick?    If Ottawa gets rid of Anderson, they're doing the sensible thing and edging closer to a guy like Hughes.    If we get Anderson, it just brings us further away from that possibility, and I can almost guarantee we will miss the playoffs this year. According to past years, there's a 78% chance we miss.    We should be looking to *shed* a goaltender, not add one. Sh
    • 4
      Post
      It's exactly like the behavior of an addict. 
    • 4
      Post
      Drafting 1st again?
×
×
  • Create New...