pilldoc Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 (edited) The Philadelphia Flyers and defenseman Travis Sanheim have agreed to a two-year deal with an average annual value of $3.25 million, the team announced Monday. https://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/1790127 Edited June 24, 2019 by pilldoc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 A good deal for both sides. Sanheim can turn this into a huge pay day if he plays his cards right. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vis Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Good $$ number. I'll take it on the length. Sanheim can sign a bigger deal when Niskanen rolls off. Curious to see what Provorov signs on for now. I'd prefer to see him get a longer term deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 9 minutes ago, vis said: Good $$ number. I'll take it on the length. Sanheim can sign a bigger deal when Niskanen rolls off. Curious to see what Provorov signs on for now. I'd prefer to see him get a longer term deal. Yes he will be 25 at the end of this and then can sign for an 8 year deal maybe he will still be a RFA. So now get TK and Ivan done. Hartman shouldn't be hard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Almost forgot about Laughton and Bailey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachX Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 36 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said: Hartman shouldn't be hard..... to replace I like that better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJgoal Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Ugh. Definitely don't like the term here. But hey, it helps with the cap issues Fletcher has created, so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, CoachX said: I like that better I think Hartman is a very good bottom 6 option in the right situation he can produce. He has put up 19 goals before Laughton hasn't even ever done that. I think he bring value to the lineup and long as he is given good linemates. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elmatus Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 1 minute ago, AJgoal said: Ugh. Definitely don't like the term here. But hey, it helps with the cap issues Fletcher has created, so... With the Hayes contract on the books, and Provo's camp saying they want term, I think this was probably the best case scenario for Sanheim. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachX Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 35 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said: I think Hartman is a very good bottom 6 option in the right situation he can produce. He has put up 19 goals before Laughton hasn't even ever done that. I think he bring value to the lineup and long as he is given good linemates. Be careful ther OR, according to many on this forum, past success does not mean future rewards. Hence the enthusiasm for moving ghost after a down year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 10 minutes ago, CoachX said: Be careful ther OR, according to many on this forum, past success does not mean future rewards. Hence the enthusiasm for moving ghost after a down year Yeah I know it's only a matter of time before I'm reported. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 34 minutes ago, CoachX said: Be careful ther OR, according to many on this forum, past success does not mean future rewards. Hence the enthusiasm for moving ghost after a down year REPORTED! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 36 minutes ago, CoachX said: Be careful ther OR, according to many on this forum, past success does not mean future rewards. Hence the enthusiasm for moving ghost after a down year Thanks for ratting me out!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachX Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Podein25 said: REPORTED! that didnt take long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lindbergh31 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 2 hours ago, vis said: Good $$ number. I'll take it on the length. Sanheim can sign a bigger deal when Niskanen rolls off. Curious to see what Provorov signs on for now. I'd prefer to see him get a longer term deal. As long as Fletcher doesn't sign Provorov to a 2 year deal where they have to try and resign both to long deals at the same time then I'm fine with Sanheim being signed to the shorter deal. Hopefully Fletcher gets Provorov signed to a long-term deal. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vis Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, Lindbergh31 said: As long as Fletcher doesn't sign Provorov to a 2 year deal where they have to try and resign both to long deals at the same time then I'm fine with Sanheim being signed to the shorter deal. Hopefully Fletcher gets Provorov signed to a long-term deal. Exactly. Can't have both coming due at the same time again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctid Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Sanheim will still be a RFA after his new deal expires right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCFlyguy Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Seattle should love this contract in a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Knut Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 5 hours ago, OccamsRazor said: A good deal for both sides. Sanheim can turn this into a huge pay day if he plays his cards right. ...a pay day the Flyers won’t be able to afford until the year AFTER this deal expires. This deal is a head scratcher to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Knut Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 2 hours ago, SCFlyguy said: Seattle should love this contract in a year. Im glad someone’s thinking ahead. Too bad Fletcher didn’t have you in the room. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Knut Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 3 hours ago, ctid said: Sanheim will still be a RFA after his new deal expires right? Yes. So there’s that. It’ll make life a lot easier for Seattle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 1 hour ago, King Knut said: ...a pay day the Flyers won’t be able to afford until the year AFTER this deal expires. This deal is a head scratcher to me. Not really it's a prove it deal. They couldn't agree on a longer term. So they found a short one they agreed on. I'm fine we'll worry about it in 2 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 4 hours ago, SCFlyguy said: Seattle should love this contract in a year. Sanheim will get protected. No worries there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruxpin Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 8 hours ago, OccamsRazor said: Almost forgot about Laughton and Bailey. There is nothing to remember about Bailey. I wouldn't even tender him. Let him walk. I'm sure he'll get an offer from Bankers Life & Casualty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruxpin Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 7 hours ago, CoachX said: Be careful ther OR, according to many on this forum, past success does not mean future rewards. Hence the enthusiasm for moving ghost after a down year Please. I really don't get what either of you or anyone else sees in Hartman. I'd trade him for a Klondike Bar. A melted, moldy one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.