BluPuk Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 I don't get it. I know the NHL's centennial year is supposed to be a celebration of hockey (read $money$ if you are an owner) in general, but why release a list of the 100 greatest players of all time and list it alphabetically? Is it like a participation trophy? () What is the point of making the list at all, and not ranking them? There would be lots of debate and conversation if you ranked them. This way, I didn't even finish reading the list. I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hf101 Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 I get the list, and I'm ok with the list alphabetically. Likely, there was a committee that formulated the list and came to a conclusion to naming the top 100. A task much easier than actually ranking them. They are being honored for being in the top 100. It is a group honor. I didn't finish reading the list either, not because I didn't want to, but because the NHL's website is sooooooo...... freaking elongated that I didn't care to scroll through the entire length of names with an inch of space in between each one. Placing them in a table format would have been a much better where you can click on a name if you wanted to read more details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.