Personally, fighting is not the reason why I watch hockey. I watch hockey for the goals and passing, and skill players. Outlawing fighting might be a good change, but it would radically alter the culture of the game, especially the unwritten rules. For instance, a cheap shot or unwarranted contact with the goalie will lead to a fight from the opposition's enforcer, but there would probably be a different means of retaliation if fighting was banned. Currently, fighting is punished by a major penalty, but this will not be enough to keep enforcers out. I would rather have fewer people play hockey, even if this means excluding players like Tiger Williams and Bob Probert who could score as well as fight. The European players tend to fight less, but no one calls them chicken or sissy the way they were called in the 1970s. The Europeans in the NHL play a less physical, more finesse-oriented style, but can hit if needed, so the NHL might absorb more European players than there are currently. And if the NHL changes, then the OHL and other junior leagues will change the way they enforce fighting. This will be a radical change, but there will have to be some alternative system to deal with cheap shots. Now, the players punish cheap-shooters, but maybe add cheap-shotting as a category of diving as a penalty?