The shorter entry contracts is the owners way of trying to control player costs. As we saw with the Eberle and Hall contracts, amongst others, good young players are cashing in with that second contract. By reducing entry level contracts to 2 years, the owners are hoping to push escalating player costs back to the third contract instead of the second. It won't necessarily work as Hall managed to cash in with a year remaining on his entry level deal, but I think the intent is to attempt to control costs while allowing teams 3 contracts before a player hits UFA status. The thing is, the PA gained a lot of contractual rights in the last CBA by agreeing to the 24% rollback and salary cap. With this latest proposal, it still seems like the players are the ones giving up everything: their split goes down 7%, they go from no term limits to 5 years, UFA age goes up, etc. What do the players gain here? Nothing, from what I've seen - except the 82 game schedule for 2012-13 which is really a win-win for both sides, not just the PA.