Jump to content

Howie58

Supporting Member
  • Posts

    5,861
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Posts posted by Howie58

  1. No surprise in goal. Errs may be worn out.

     

    The other side here is our forwards. The PHLY gang dissected it. They are all slumping big time. Coots' performance raises long-term questions. He hasn't played more than 60 games in over 4 seasons.

     

    May only catch part of game. Lots at stake. Win or lose, they need to be respectable. Agreed with Morganti and Ashlyn, they are marginal against SJ, and haven't looked good in weeks. Losing Walker may mean more than we could imagine. 

     

     

  2. Greetings:

     

    The gauntlet continues with the Bruins favored (-194):

    https://www.lines.com/nhl/predictions/flyers-vs-bruins-puck-line-mar-16-2024

     

    Statistically, the biggest differences are in the PP and offense, advantage Bruins:

    https://www.nhl.com/gamecenter/bos-vs-phi/2024/03/16/2023021064

     

    We lost 6-2 in Philly on January 27th.  Boston has been tough on us historically; we are on a six-game loss streak against them:

    https://champsorchumps.us/team/nhl/boston-bruins/head-to-head/philadelphia-flyers#:~:text=The Bruins have an overall record of 137-86-21-4,a 119-72-21-4 (60.0%) record against the Philadelphia Flyers.

     

     

  3. When speaking of talent and the Flyers, I go back to my "DNA Hypothesis," and why I mentioned Rathje in the SJ game thread. For too long, the people running this team put physicality over skill and speed.  And it has kept us from moving out of the fair-to-middling ranks, with an implosion under AV.  I don't think we will ever see MM, but I can accept Briere and Company swinging for that fence.  The Gurianov deal is similar.  The guy may be an NHL bust.  But he can fly and seems to have a good shot.  I don't think the former Flyers management really scoped high end talent.  They wanted people who could play "Flyers Hockey"  Acquiring Nic Deslauriers made us "tougher to play against."  Right.  

  4. Yes, we are having a reality attack. Stripping out the D via trade and injury is icing on the crapper.  We have lost 8 in a row to Toronto. Their talent is truly high end. Hopefully, we get there. 

     

    On that point, hearing Shaw and Thompson post-game has been refreshing. They acknowledge the problems. They provide context. I get Torts' anti-media gig, but as a fan, I lose some color. Shaw and Thompson are truly students of the game, and their take is a learning experience for me. We are blessed to have those guys on board. I wish we heard more from them.

  5. 3 hours ago, Cheesesteak said:

    think this is the same one OccamsRazor posts...working nicely for me so far.

    https://the.streameast.app/nhlstreams

    Dear Cheesesteak:

     

    Yeah, it is pisser.  But it reflects the mess/game the networks find themselves in with sports.  Cord cutting damps demand for the traditional networks and linear.  But a sizable chunk of viewers want to watch sports in real time (they don't seem to care about it with local news and most other programs) but... that crew is bothered to buy what I might call "multi-sport" packages (cable or streaming) when it only wants one.  I think this is going to take years to settle, and the Bally Sports bankruptcy didn't help.  So, we'll see this multi-channel model in the meantime.  

  6. 5 minutes ago, OccamsRazor said:

     

    Good to hear because if they truly truly want to win and make the playoffs you must ice the best lineup possible play no favorites and hold everyone accountable.

     

    Only way it will truly work.

    I hate to say it, but the Cammer's recovery from last year may never take place.  As for ND--as we noted at the time, the length of the contract was absurd.  At this juncture, he gums up the works for a promising youngster.  We can thank Mr. Fletcher for this stellar contribution.

     

     

    • Like 4
  7. 1 hour ago, GratefulFlyers said:

    @Howie58 

     

    good lord what made you think of those 2?
     

    What I remember most about Hatcher when the Flyers signed him was one word: Now? Nothing against the guy he had a fine career with Dallas but like a lot of Holmgren’s acquisitions long past his prime when the Flyers got him. 

    Grateful, I think it was playing SJ.  That made me think about the Rathje...yeah, they knew he was not cut out for the "New NHL."  

    • Like 1
  8. Greetings:

     

    Toronto is the favorite (-192); they are on a 7-0 run against us (won back in February 4-3 in OT, Matthews hat trick):

    https://www.oddsshark.com/nhl/toronto-philadelphia-odds-march-14-2024-2020074

     

    We may be a better defensive club, but they are far better on faceoffs and offense, including the PP:

    https://www.nhl.com/gamecenter/phi-vs-tor/2024/03/14/2023021050

     

    Rocky Thompson said it in the presser post-San Jose:  The Flyers can only play one type of game, their own.  Going on a penalty fest and playing undisciplined hockey against the Leafs will be painful.  

    • Thanks 1
  9. Greetings:

     

    The old farts will remember that we signed Mike Rathje and Derian Hatcher post-strike:

    https://www.hockeyforum.com/threads/flyers-sign-hatcher-rathje-and-therien.32782/page-2

     

    We found out that meant "Twin Pylons" in our D.  Hatcher gave us some use.  As for Rathje, who was with San Jose:

    https://thehockeynews.com/news/philadelphia-flyers-defenceman-mike-rathje-sidelined-by-herniated-disc

     

    He went on LTIR and contributed next to nothing.  I guess San Jose realized what the New NHL would bring.  Robert Earle Clarke and other GMs didn't.  Let's hope Briere breaks the mold.

     

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  10. Another comment: I think it was JJ who said this was only the second Flyer win at home against San Jose since 2000. Some of the Quant jocks need to assess our troubles against this team. I get troubles out West at the beginning or end of a West Coast swing. But we're even worse at home!

     

    On that score,  we won, but it was ugly. Too many penalties. Our lack of depth is showing. But I'm glad Frost and Tippett have some game- changing skill. We need more.

    • Like 1
  11. 4 hours ago, radoran said:

     

    It's a little deceptive because they didn't play home and away each year for many years so the Sharks didn't play as often in Philadelphia.

     

    Without looking, also possible pandemic cancellations.

     

    Flyers need to TCOB here if they want to make the playoffs. Many teams nipping at their heels.

    Rad:

     

    Here is another piece on the history between the teams.  Our last home win against them was February 2020.  Our overall record has to be one of the worst against any team; we are marginally better in San Jose than Philly:

     

    https://flyershistory.com/cgi-bin/opponent.cgi?San_Jose_Sharks

     

     

  12. Greetings:

     

    The Flyers are heavily favored (-238), but read some of the fine print:  San Jose has taken eight of the last 10, and they're 12-2 out of the last 14 at Wells Fargo--

    https://www.oddsshark.com/nhl/san-jose-philadelphia-odds-march-12-2024-2020004

     

    Statistically, neither team is great at faceoffs, but our defense is better:

    https://www.nhl.com/gamecenter/phi-vs-sjs/2024/03/12/2023021035

     

    But our defense may be impaired via injury.  We should be angry after the debacle in TB.  But this game may be closer than the bookies suggest.  

    • Thanks 1
  13. 7 minutes ago, GratefulFlyers said:

     

    Yes and it would be a real boost to the team's psyche if they could take both in Florida. I don't remember the last time that happened - if ever. TB has had the Flyers' number forever it seems but the Flyers are playing real good hockey these days. Whatever happens at the TD today...I expect the Flyers will bring the same effort/energy they had in Sunrise.

     

    Good to see Center Ice will have the Flyers' feed available this time.

    I was thinking this AM that an unsung hero of last night is Ian Lapierriere. He and his staff are instilling some good habits.  He was a tough fu...k.  His coaching offspring are showing some of his grit.  That is great for both squads.  

    • Like 2
  14. 30 minutes ago, radoran said:

     

    The trajectory of Johansen from $8M max length must have player to "might give you something if he costs $2M" should be instructive to most GMs.

     

    It won't be, but should.

    A short-term cancer in the locker room who might chip in a goal or two might be worth it to somebody.  As a car salesman told me, "there's a butt for every car seat."  Shoot, even a seventh or future considerations would be better than the dead cap burden.  But what the hell do I know?

  15. 22 minutes ago, radoran said:

     

    I'm sure he's "in play" but I don't see him going anywhere.

     

    The additional retain concept on Johansen is an interesting idea... 😎

     

    I see a few minor moves today, at best (from the Flyers).

    Normally, Danny seems pretty cautious in his choice of words.  But in the case of Johansen, he didn't mince words.  He made it clear Johnansen wasn't in the future plans and told him to stay put and effectively keep his bags packed. I can't recall that level of public disdain/contempt for a player from any GM.  

×
×
  • Create New...