TedZep Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Loosely based on two year scoring averages and not really much else, this is a slightly better package than the Rangers gave up to get Nash.Assuming it was on the table, should the Flyers have done this deal? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doom88 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Yep, except the salary doesn't work as well as the NYR deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radoran Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Loosely based on two year scoring averages and not really much else, this is a slightly better package than the Rangers gave up to get Nash.Assuming it was on the table, should the Flyers have done this deal?Oh. Hell. No.I'd say that's a MUCH better package than the Rangers gave up for Nash, doubly so given the position Nashville is in.Screw 'em. Hard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCFlyer10 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 I really like Talbot, great X-factor, he does everything asked of him Brindy all over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedZep Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 @doom88I didn't consider salary cap ramifications, or terms of their current deals, except that Voracek is due to be renegotiated and this way it becomes someone elses problem.It looks like the Rangers got away with a steal, which is very unfortunate. Columbus demanded the best of the Flyers' young guns but settled when it came to the Rangers. I only like it when Homer screws over the other guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.