hobie Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 An expansion team?, 4th place in the entire NHL. GF higher than TO's in less games, GA same as TO's but they've been playing with their 4th stringer, a junior on occasion. After 30+ games I don't think we're talking too small sample size so what's up? A FLC nope, a #1, #2 or #3 d-man don't think so. Stars, in the casinos sure but not on their roster well except for Fleury who has only played 6 games. Leipsic is 23 gp, 0g, 10 a. There's 27 NHL that should be hanging their heads in shame, one in particular I can think of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluPuk Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 Shows you what kind of a league the NHL is. Yah, I know that sounds very negative, but there you have it. Proof positive. The NHL's dream of "parity" has arrived, but it's not "parity", it's mediocrity. All vanilla teams. All teams play the same way. Switch two teams uniforms and you wouldn't know the difference really. Yaaawwn.... Now you can see the real reason the NHL doesn't want "its" players at the olympics or the worlds championships. It has precious little to do with possible injuries. The difference in level of play is plainly obvious and is worlds apart from any league in the world, and the NHL knows it and is trying desperately to hang onto their cash cow. Crank up the hype machine Gary .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WordsOfWisdom Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 @BluPukI agree with the parity thing, but I still think the numbers game will catch up to them eventually. (I don't mention them by name because I refuse to acknowledge their existense.) @hobie Don't worry, it isn't sustainable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.