OK, enough.
First, that's just disingenuous. He was the only player to get a letter. And Torts did comment on his leadership: https://www.nhl.com/news/scott-laughton-emerges-as-leader-example-for-philadelphia-flyers/c-336450704
Second, how many teams meet whatever your criteria are for "solidly built"? Three? Four? Laughton could easily play 3rd line center and first unit PK on the vast majority of NHL teams. He's an upgrade in the top 6 on several. Because he's reliable.
We already know you don't really know that much about hockey, you don't have to constantly remind us.
Dunno, it's not a team I follow much. Maybe @yave1964 could weigh in with some insight. 6th overall and so much excitement about him after he came over to play in Halifax.
I'm thrilled with the pick here and like the Bonk pick as well.
Otherwise, I'm still dying of laughter from the Hayes trade. Nobody could see that coming 5 years ago, lol.
I agree Howie. The thing I don't get is that the Flyer identity - tough to play against, hard working, team first etc. - exists *regardless* of whether people like Clarke are around or not. It's in the culture to a large extent, it's in the sign guy's signs, it's in fans' expectations, it's in the minds of the local media. You know what I mean? You don't lose it if Clarke is gone.
You know, if you fix the wonky transmission, put some new tires on it, give it a lick of paint, and fill the trunk up with halibut, the Risto would have some value.