jammer2 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Ok, so there's where we can agree to disagree: I take player A over the guy (B) who has plateaued. Every day. Twice on Sundays. That is the very reason why I was ok with Laughton over Matta a few years back. Laughts has come no where near showing what he can do...and Matta was pretty well plateaued like you said. For all intensive purposes, Matta was kinda what you see is what you get and Scott was just showing us the tip of the iceberg. When it's all said and done, the Flyers will be the clear cut winners here, although it will take 3-4 years to get to that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackStraw Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Ok, so there's where we can agree to disagree: I take player A over the guy (B) who has plateaued. Every day. Twice on Sundays. Ok. I guess you're entitled to your (stupid, insane) opinion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 We should all be proud of our prospects threads of late.....we blow away most other sites in this regard....some very, very interesting reads of late....keep up the great work guys!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 That is the very reason why I was ok with Laughton over Matta a few years back. Laughts has come no where near showing what he can do...and Matta was pretty well plateaued like you said. For all intensive purposes, Matta was kinda what you see is what you get and Scott was just showing us the tip of the iceberg. When it's all said and done, the Flyers will be the clear cut winners here, although it will take 3-4 years to get to that point. Well you've been right before buddy so who am I to disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.