Commander Clueless Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Big win by the comeback kids in Calgary, despite what is apparently a controversial no-goal call. I don't have a problem with an inconclusive call there from the team in Toronto. They're showing some life. Anaheim is just a power house, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Nice win by the Flames, just take it once game at a time, they showed they can play with the Ducks in this game...gotta take it a few minutes at a time, not even periods....or the task can become to daunting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 @jammer2 I can't see the Flames pulling another one out, but they still must be feeling good about themselves and feel they have momentum what with the way they won. The Ducks are just too dangerous to keep off the scoreboard for very long. If the Getzlaf line doesn't get you the Kesler line does. Or the 3rd line. Or their D. But, Go Flames. It would be good to see the scantily clad Red Mile again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terranraida Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 Only one more game until Anaheim moves on to face the Central Powerhouse that is the Blackhawks. Not looking forward to that series. It's gonna be rough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 Only one more game until Anaheim moves on to face the Central Powerhouse that is the Blackhawks. Not looking forward to that series. It's gonna be rough.Should be a dandy. Hard to pick a winner. Ducks look good but haven't had to play NSH and MIN to get through. Edge to the Hawks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terranraida Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 Should be a dandy. Hard to pick a winner. Ducks look good but haven't had to play NSH and MIN to get through. Edge to the Hawks? Anaheim had to play a ultra physical Jets though, and a hungry Flames team. Don't discredit Anaheim's run because they didn't play Nashville or Minnesota. I also don't put faith in the regular season games because Anaheim played with a AHL defense and forwards when everyone was injured and had mumps. I think this will ultimately come down to goaltending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 Anaheim had to play a ultra physical Jets though, and a hungry Flames team. Don't discredit Anaheim's run because they didn't play Nashville or Minnesota. I also don't put faith in the regular season games because Anaheim played with a AHL defense and forwards when everyone was injured and had mumps.I think this will ultimately come down to goaltending.It's true that the Ducks had to play the very physical Jets, but I don't think it had much effect on them. It was only 4 games for one thing. And they actually out-physicaled the Jets IMO.The Anaheim D is better than I thoughtMobile and they move the pick quickly. Anaheim's neutral zone team play is as good as any team I've seen in the playoffs.Welcome by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted May 10, 2015 Share Posted May 10, 2015 Another thing to factor in....the Ducks had to come from behind 3 straight times to beat the Jets...so it's not like it was a cakewalk...in the end, hard not to think that the Ducks believe in themsleves more after the Jets series. Coming back that many times can give a team a feeling that they are never out of it...and it's great for team bonding as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanyan Posted May 11, 2015 Share Posted May 11, 2015 Flames lost. Now Johnny "hockey" can get his cartoon golf ball eyes fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TropicalFruitGirl26 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 Flames lost. Now Johnny "hockey" can get his cartoon golf ball eyes fixed. I dunno...he had a good season and an excellent rookie playoff season. Sounds to me like his 'cartoon golf ball eyes' (whatever the hell THAT means) are just fine.I'd leave them as it is. It probably has the effect of freaking out Vancouver defensemen too...which again, is a plus for his team.Why mess with a good thing, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.