More Hockey Stats Posted January 3, 2017 Share Posted January 3, 2017 Below is a couple of images. One indicates who played who already, and how many times (shades of grey, 5 darkest, but nobody played each other five times yet). Another indicates which opponents the points came from (shades of grey, 10pt darkest, but nobody ...) Enjoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notfondajane Posted January 3, 2017 Share Posted January 3, 2017 Is it possible to use numbers? Seriously!☺ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluPuk Posted January 3, 2017 Share Posted January 3, 2017 Paintings by Jackson Pollack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hf101 Posted January 3, 2017 Share Posted January 3, 2017 The first chart really should have a steady patterns in the East and West by the end of the year as every team plays against their opponents equally in the conferences for the most part. The second chart is actually kinda cool while it shows the variance of the teams at the top of the standings vs the bottom. Nice job @More Hockey Stats ! Although it took me 3 times looking at the visual displays to get it. I thought I might actually have ADHD though with the the visualization overload. lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nossagog Posted January 3, 2017 Share Posted January 3, 2017 As always, information is good. MoreHockeyStats, if you did this yourself, I'd see what it looks like if your grouped the teams by their division and conference. That could be a very telling figure,especially the second chart of where the games came from. On a secondary note, if you stare at the TBL X on the first chart long enough, the chart blurs into the Mona Lisa, Amazing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Hockey Stats Posted January 3, 2017 Author Share Posted January 3, 2017 4 hours ago, notfondajane said: Is it possible to use numbers? Seriously!☺ You mean, like that: CBJ X 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 2 3 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 2 PIT 1 X 2 2 3 2 0 2 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 3 0 1 1 1 MIN 1 2 X 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 1 3 WSH 2 2 0 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 4 2 2 3 0 1 NYR 1 3 1 1 X 0 2 1 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 MTL 2 2 1 1 0 X 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 CHI 1 0 0 1 2 1 X 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 SJS 2 2 0 1 1 2 2 X 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 0 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 3 0 OTT 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 X 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 0 3 1 0 EDM 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 X 2 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 STL 2 0 3 1 2 1 4 1 0 2 X 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 4 0 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 ANA 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 4 2 2 0 X 2 1 0 1 2 2 3 2 0 2 3 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 PHI 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 X 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 TOR 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 X 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 TBL 2 1 0 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 X 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 3 3 3 0 1 0 1 BOS 3 1 2 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 X 2 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 1 2 CAR 0 1 0 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 2 2 X 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 2 2 0 0 LAK 2 2 1 0 0 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 X 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CGY 2 0 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 X 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 4 1 NSH 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 1 2 0 4 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 0 X 0 3 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 3 FLA 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 3 2 3 1 0 0 0 X 1 1 4 1 2 1 2 0 2 DAL 2 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 1 X 2 1 0 1 3 0 1 4 VAN 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 3 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 X 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 DET 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 X 1 1 2 2 1 0 NYI 1 3 2 4 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 X 0 1 2 1 0 NJD 0 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 X 1 2 1 0 WPG 1 0 2 2 2 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 X 1 1 3 BUF 0 1 2 3 1 1 0 0 3 2 1 0 1 1 1 4 2 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 2 1 X 0 0 ARI 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 3 1 3 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 4 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 X 2 COL 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 3 2 4 2 0 0 0 3 0 2 X ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Hockey Stats Posted January 3, 2017 Author Share Posted January 3, 2017 18 minutes ago, nossagog said: As always, information is good. MoreHockeyStats, if you did this yourself, I'd see what it looks like if your grouped the teams by their division and conference. That could be a very telling figure,especially the second chart of where the games came from. On a secondary note, if you stare at the TBL X on the first chart long enough, the chart blurs into the Mona Lisa, Amazing! I can toy with it sorting by division, conference and score rather than just by score. Stay tuned! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hf101 Posted January 3, 2017 Share Posted January 3, 2017 Just now, More Hockey Stats said: You mean, like that: CBJ X 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 2 3 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 2 PIT 1 X 2 2 3 2 0 2 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 3 0 1 1 1 MIN 1 2 X 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 1 3 WSH 2 2 0 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 4 2 2 3 0 1 NYR 1 3 1 1 X 0 2 1 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 MTL 2 2 1 1 0 X 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 CHI 1 0 0 1 2 1 X 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 SJS 2 2 0 1 1 2 2 X 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 0 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 3 0 OTT 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 X 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 0 3 1 0 EDM 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 X 2 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 STL 2 0 3 1 2 1 4 1 0 2 X 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 4 0 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 ANA 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 4 2 2 0 X 2 1 0 1 2 2 3 2 0 2 3 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 PHI 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 X 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 TOR 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 X 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 TBL 2 1 0 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 X 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 3 3 3 0 1 0 1 BOS 3 1 2 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 X 2 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 1 2 CAR 0 1 0 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 2 2 X 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 2 2 0 0 LAK 2 2 1 0 0 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 X 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CGY 2 0 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 X 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 4 1 NSH 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 1 2 0 4 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 0 X 0 3 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 3 FLA 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 3 2 3 1 0 0 0 X 1 1 4 1 2 1 2 0 2 DAL 2 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 1 X 2 1 0 1 3 0 1 4 VAN 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 3 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 X 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 DET 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 X 1 1 2 2 1 0 NYI 1 3 2 4 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 X 0 1 2 1 0 NJD 0 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 X 1 2 1 0 WPG 1 0 2 2 2 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 X 1 1 3 BUF 0 1 2 3 1 1 0 0 3 2 1 0 1 1 1 4 2 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 2 1 X 0 0 ARI 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 3 1 3 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 4 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 X 2 COL 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 3 2 4 2 0 0 0 3 0 2 X ? lol, I appreciated the shades of grey actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Hockey Stats Posted January 3, 2017 Author Share Posted January 3, 2017 Just now, hf101 said: lol, I appreciated the shades of grey actually. Actually, the visualization is essentially of the schedule strength (Buchholz coef.) and of Sonneborn-Berger score that I calculate on my website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notfondajane Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 12 hours ago, More Hockey Stats said: You mean, like that: CBJ X 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 2 3 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 2 PIT 1 X 2 2 3 2 0 2 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 3 0 1 1 1 MIN 1 2 X 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 1 3 WSH 2 2 0 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 4 2 2 3 0 1 NYR 1 3 1 1 X 0 2 1 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 MTL 2 2 1 1 0 X 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 CHI 1 0 0 1 2 1 X 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 SJS 2 2 0 1 1 2 2 X 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 0 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 3 0 OTT 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 X 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 0 3 1 0 EDM 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 X 2 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 STL 2 0 3 1 2 1 4 1 0 2 X 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 4 0 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 ANA 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 4 2 2 0 X 2 1 0 1 2 2 3 2 0 2 3 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 PHI 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 X 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 TOR 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 X 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 TBL 2 1 0 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 X 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 3 3 3 0 1 0 1 BOS 3 1 2 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 X 2 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 1 2 CAR 0 1 0 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 2 2 X 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 2 2 0 0 LAK 2 2 1 0 0 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 X 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CGY 2 0 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 X 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 4 1 NSH 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 1 2 0 4 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 0 X 0 3 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 3 FLA 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 3 2 3 1 0 0 0 X 1 1 4 1 2 1 2 0 2 DAL 2 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 1 X 2 1 0 1 3 0 1 4 VAN 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 3 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 X 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 DET 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 X 1 1 2 2 1 0 NYI 1 3 2 4 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 X 0 1 2 1 0 NJD 0 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 X 1 2 1 0 WPG 1 0 2 2 2 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 X 1 1 3 BUF 0 1 2 3 1 1 0 0 3 2 1 0 1 1 1 4 2 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 2 1 X 0 0 ARI 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 3 1 3 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 4 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 X 2 COL 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 3 2 4 2 0 0 0 3 0 2 X ? Yes! Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notfondajane Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 12 hours ago, More Hockey Stats said: I can toy with it sorting by division, conference and score rather than just by score. Stay tuned! Try games played! Separated by division, then conference instead by score! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Hockey Stats Posted January 5, 2017 Author Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/3/2017 at 7:29 PM, notfondajane said: Try games played! Separated by division, then conference instead by score! Like that: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nossagog Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 7 hours ago, More Hockey Stats said: Like that: Yes I really like this grouping. You can quickly see how a team is performing against its division and conference. As well as how the conferences are comparing against each other. You could use some bordering in this format to further highlight the groupings of the divisions/conferences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Hockey Stats Posted January 31, 2017 Author Share Posted January 31, 2017 Here's an update: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Hockey Stats Posted March 2, 2017 Author Share Posted March 2, 2017 Another look at the schedule: games played, points scored, games remaining, pts expected. First, let's start with the played games and points. Naturally, most of the squares above the X-diagonal indicate more points than the ones below; however we can see interesting anomalies, such as BUF-OTT, TOR-BOS, ARI-SJS, WPG-CHI and probably the most intriguing: NYR - WSH (expected 1st round meeting) Another unusual thing is that the Sharks are only playing Colorado twice this season rather than the regular 3-4 intraconference games. Now let's take a look at the remaining games and the expected points. We can see that STL may expect a big boost from having to play Colorado four(!) more times this season as well as Arizona three times and that Ottawa has two biggest season series mostly unresolved - against MTL and BOS. The expected points are being calculated based on teams Elo rating: xPts = Ngames/(1 + 10(Eloopp-Eloteam)/400)) however for the sake of precision this number should've been scaled by 2 (since it produces an outcome between 0 and 1 (0.5 for a "tie") and also by the OT factor, i .e. the probability of a team getting an OT point, around 1.125. But for visualization purposes this does not matter. There are also nice patters indicating travels through California and Western Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TropicalFruitGirl26 Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 Nice charts, but I gotta say, good gawd, I feel like I just went to the optometrist and they are fitting me for a new set of eyewear..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Hockey Stats Posted April 16, 2017 Author Share Posted April 16, 2017 Here are the charts for the end of the regular season: And here are the final crosstables: More about the teams season schedule strength and performance here: http://morehockeystats.com/teams/buchberg Buchholz and Sonneborn-Berger explained: http://morehockeystats.blogspot.com/2017/03/on-buchholz-and-sonneborn-berger.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.