dilbert719

This would be easier to take if they stopped trying on the "terrible hockey team" hat.

4 years, $14.5M, $3.625M annual cap hit.

More money than I was expecting, less than I was fearing. Overall, I think we can live with that.

Cleary's now apparently an undone deal.

Elliotte Friedman ‏@FriedgeHNIC 6m

Not exactly sure why, but it appears as if there is some complication between Daniel Cleary and PHI. Told he will not be joining Flyers.

The divisional alignment is acceptable, if you take into account the financial boost the Florida teams will get from having that many Canadian teams in their division. The names are just dumb.

This could have been resolved, if the NHL had the basic sense to revert to the old conference names.

Wales Conference

Eastern Division: MTL/TOR/BOS/BUF/DET/OTT/FLA/TB

Mideast Division: PHI/PIT/NYI/NYR/NJ/CAR/WAS/CMB

Campbell Conference

Western Division: ANA/LA/SJ/PHX/VAN/EDM/CGY

Midwest Division: CHI/DAL/COL/MIN/WPG/STL/NAS

Simple, clean, reasonably descriptive, nothing wrong with that, and all it takes is freeing up the word "Eastern."

I dunno. I find it hard to believe that NBC doesn't have a hand in making the schedule. They're a huge source of revenue for the NHL, as well as the biggest mouthpiece for expanding interest in the league.

A hand, certainly. Schedule creation has to be one of the hardest parts of a season from an administrative standpoint, though. About half the teams in the league aren't their building's primary anchor tenant, so they have to negotiate with the other team, there are one-off events, you have to balance travel days, nights off, making sure you don't require back-to-back cross-country flights, TV broadcast issues, arena maintenance work, that sort of nonsense. It's got to be more rigid a process than people think it is.

There's also the alternate possibility that the league recognizes that Detroit and Buffalo have much less reason to dislike each other than any other team in that division not based in Florida (who are just kind of screwed on the rivalry front), and wants to gin up some hatred.

Detroit: Jewel of the Atlantic Ocean, by Gary Bettman

It's hard to blame them for choosing Sabres/Red Wings, since they only have three games to choose from that night, and one of the three starts at 10 PM EST. Toronto/Philadelphia might have been the more logical call (the other game being Anaheim/Colorado), but NBC carries exactly one Toronto game this year, and it's the Winter Classic, which is being broadcast on NBC, CBC, and RDS. Makes me think there's a broadcast rights issue. For that matter, NBCSN carries only four games all season that include even one Canadian team, and only one (the Heritage Classic between Ottawa and Vancouver) that doesn't include the Montreal Canadiens.

@hf101

The whole rivalry night thing is a good idea, just make the games rivalries of the present or the past.....not a made up marketing gimmick to fake Detroit and Buffalo into thinking there has ever been a rivalry between the Wings and Sabres.

And when they say this in the article, which came from NBC's website:

"The rivalry night coverage will also feature one team from north of the border – the Montreal Canadiens will host the Bruins on March 12."

Um, we got one team from Canada on one night? I guess EDM-CAL, TOR-DET, MON-TOR, et al won't be featured.

Given that NBC/NBCSN are only broadcasting 5 games featuring even one Canadian team between them, again, I'm fairly certain there's a broadcast rights issue that's keeping the games locked to US teams only. To watch the Canadian teams in the US, the options are local team broadcasts, NHLN, Center Ice, or less savory internet-based options.

Interesting point. If you were a scout, would you put more stock in GWG or in third period goals?

Not sure, since there are a good number of games that are functionally over by the third period, just as there are a number of games where the GWG really is irrelevant.

What I'd probably put the most stock in is GWG with 1 goal Margin of Victory. Not every player pots those regularly, and I'd be interested to see what players consistently pot winning goals in tie games. That's pretty much the ultimate "clutch goal" stat.

Maybe he feels his performance last year was rather dissapointing, especially after his strong rookie campaign, so he felt he had a lot to prove to the Flyers... I don't know.... guess looking for some explanations that would make sense.

The only explanation I have is that perhaps he figures for this year and next, Lecavalier will be the unquestioned #2 center, but perhaps in that last season, Couturier's development and Vinny's decline could result in the two of them switching positions on the depth chart, and the long-term contract he could get as the Flyers' #2 center would be superior to the deal he'd get the year before as our #3.

I'm not sure why they wouldn't. They still own the WFC (and operate another 50 arenas beyond that), and it makes sense to own the anchor tenant as well. The bigger concern is whether or not they would spend the needed amount if that were to come to pass.

If they were to sell out, it seems likely that the Harris group would get first crack at buying the team and the arena, and they'd probably be offered to the other two sports ownership groups thereafter. If all of those turned down the opportunity, then we'd be looking at owners from outside Philadelphia, unless there's a hockey-mad billionaire around here that I'm unaware of.

This is a snarky comment on Holmgren, NOT on Benham but I am beginning to wonder whether Holmgren will still be GM when/if this happens.

At least now we know why they seemed willing to make Holmgren available for this; he's not going to have anything else to do fairly soon.

Sure thing , if he doesn't mind my Persian accent. Man when someone in your family is sick, it affects you too. Got some good news from doctor, so should be able to clear my mind soon.

That's great to hear, behnam. No rush on this from our end; take care of your family first. We can wait.

That was my first thought. I can't imagine why Hexy would leave LA unless he thought (or was told) he'd have a shorter path to the GM job here in Philly. Maybe Homer is thinking about retiring soon-ish?

Even if he's not, Homer's definitely on a hotter seat than Dean Lombardi. The same position here is a lot closer to the big chair than it is out in LA.

@DaGreatGazoo

I get your point, but doubt Homer would hire him to put pressure on himself. More of the old boys club, that's all.

Provided, of course, the decision to add Hextall was entirely Homer's decision, and not "suggested" from on high.

I wouldn't be shocked if Homer was considering stepping down at some point, or perhaps even getting promoted within the organization (though I'm not sure what layer of bureaucracy exists between Homer and Luukko to put him into anyway), and Hexy was the designated successor, but if Snider gets peeved at any point, we're going to have a new GM, come hell or high water, and he's already under contract.

Forsberg and Lindros on the ballot together. Let the debate begin

It would be fitting if they both went in together, but the odds of that happening next year are slim, slim, slim. Hasek and Modano are absolute 1st ballot guys for me, so we then move to the second tier. Recchi, Forsberg, Lindros, Blake, Andreychuk, and Roenick are probably that next set, with Tkachuk, Mogilny, Brind'Amour, Kariya, Weight, Rafalski, and Nolan in the third tier of "If someone has a particular liking for them" candidates.

It'll also be interesting to see if Chris Osgood's resume can overcome the sense that Manon Rheaume would have won multiple Cups playing behind that Red Wings team.

@doom88 I wanna know which scout gave the nod for the Bryz signing, or if Snider and or Homer went rogue and went against the scouts better judgement? If it's the latter, I doubt we hear the truth....ha ha.

We may not hear the truth, but if we asked something along the lines of "What guidance did Mr. Snider give you in deciding how to repair our goalie situation, and did he weigh in with any specific opinion of Bryzgalov vs. the other options," we might get something we can infer the full story from.

OK, I know we just got done with this year's inductions, but it's never too early to jump the gun!

Next year, Hasek, Modano, Recchi, and Forsberg all become eligible. Will the four of them continue to crowd out the people who didn't make it this year (alternately, will we have another small class) or do Recchi/Forsberg wait, and might some of the people who didn't make it this year get in?

Yeah, the second thing that came to my mind, after "hey, that's a really cool idea!" was "Except most of the questions we want to ask, he probably can't answer publicly." I still think it'd be great to have him here, but we're almost certainly going to have some ground rules as to what can and cannot be discussed, and just about anything related to free agency, trades, players the team has interest in, Lava's job security (other than vague platitudes) and the Bryzaster are going to be on that second list.

I prefer Emery and Mason, for the reasons everyone already listed above. Honestly, I'd be comfortable signing them both to longer deals than just the one year, but perhaps that's too much risk for the team to take at the moment.

We do develop our talent. The rest of the league is our farm system

I just wish we were allowed to call players up before they turn 32.

If Vinny does decide he'd like to go back to Tampa after this year (and if that was the plan, like others have said, he probably should have just asked for one year) I imagine it'd happen at the trade deadline, rather than in the offseason, If we kept him for a year and a half, rather than just a year, it'd be less likely to be called collusion.

Yeah. Sadly, that's pretty much exactly what I've been thinking...and with Wirtz in mind.

Problem with that is when Bill Wirtz died, Rocky took over, and Rocky's got a great head for hockey.

Ed dies, and the team will probably be fully in the grip of our Comcast overlords. I don't trust Peter Luukko to make much better decisions than Snider does.

He's a bigger name - and bigger talent - in Russia.

But one does have to wonder how the KHL can afford to be throwing around these huge deals to players when the NHL owners are, per their claims, cash-strapped and running a league in which they have trouble managing to turn even the smallest of profits...

There are quite a lot of rubles in cri... um... *looks around shiftily* LEGITIMATE BUSINESS.

So, SanFilippo had an interesting comment in his article yesterday (my apologies if this has been brought up before, I'm coming into this a bit late):

So, the Flyers stayed put. They had three guys they identified that they liked at No. 11. Two were forwards and one defenseman – Morin.

The forwards went earlier in the draft, so it was Morin, or bust for the Flyers.

So, it looks like the top three guys on our "plausible" draft board came down to Morin and two forwards taken somewhere between (let's be realistic here) 5-10. Anyone want to speculate as to who those two guys were, and perhaps more interesting, which forwards in that range weren't on the list and why?

The only possible candidates, assuming the Flyers weren't drunk and thinking MacKinnon could drop or something: Elias Lindholm, Sean Monahan, Bo Horvat, Valeri Nichushkin. Which two do we think they a) thought might be there and b) might have wanted more than Morin?

I don't understand why everybody is so anxious to trade Read. They guy did great since he got here. This was a good find by Homer, which doesn't happen often. And now you want to trade him? Unless we get a quality D back, why on Earth would the Flyers look to get rid of him?

Simply put, we can't afford Read, Giroux, Couturier, B. Schenn, and to replace Mez and Timonen next offseason. I dunno about you, but I'm not letting any of those other forwards go, and I'd very much like a defense that doesn't include Bruno Gervais.