ClusterChuck Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 2 minutes ago, wildstars95 said: people it's all about top 5 draft pick Is it a good draft pool or with our luck a swamp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbgarnett Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 1 minute ago, ClusterChuck said: Is it a good draft pool or with our luck a swamp. I'm mean no there isn't a Bedard but Macklin Celebrini is really good. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildstars95 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 high picks in each round lot's of goodies 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllaZilla Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 10 minutes ago, wildstars95 said: people it's all about top 5 draft pick But GMBG doesn’t want a top five pick, he wants Playoffs… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildstars95 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 I would start wally tomorrow for a win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildstars95 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Just now, IllaZilla said: But GMBG doesn’t want a top five pick, he wants Playoffs… billy's a drunk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllaZilla Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 7 minutes ago, bbgarnett said: I'm mean no there isn't a Bedard but Macklin Celebrini is really good. The Wild will pick Charlie Stramel v2.0… 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllaZilla Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 1 minute ago, wildstars95 said: billy's a drunk And…? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildstars95 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 3 minutes ago, IllaZilla said: And…? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClusterChuck Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) Even tho we've had some lucky success in OT's, Why not put guys like Dewey and DuHaime for speed and they can handle the puck as well as anyone out there tonight. At least they're fast enough to catch up if it's turned over. Hartman was hot tonight and not in the OT. Edited January 13 by ClusterChuck 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreaseAndAssist Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 As soon as the Flyers brought that game to OT you knew it wasn't going to end well. Better effort than what they had Wednesday but at this point, who cares? They need two points, especially against clubs like the Flyers. Wild found a way to throw away a point... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandron Posted January 13 Author Share Posted January 13 3 hours ago, bbgarnett said: Flyers 4 Wild 3 And you are the winner tonight in predicting the right score. Unbelievable, how stupidly we were able to lose this game on our home ice. Definitely, we need more stars for this team. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandron Posted January 13 Author Share Posted January 13 31 minutes ago, ClusterChuck said: Even tho we've had some lucky success in OT's, Why not put guys like Dewey and DuHaime for speed and they can handle the puck as well as anyone out there tonight. At least they're fast enough to catch up if it's turned over. Hartman was hot tonight and not in the OT. Agreed. We should try them there too. They merit more time to play.It seems Raska fits well with Dewar and Duhaime. I think as soon as they will start to produce then they will be moved to a promising young 3rd line position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreaseAndAssist Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Adam Raska works hard, but he has zero offense to him at all. I don't have an issue with putting faster players on the ice for OT than what we often throw out there. I think Connor Dewar would be a logical player to give an opportunity to in OT; fast, some offensive ability and I think he's defensively capable too. Duhaime...nah. He is fast but I'd be afraid he'd take a dumb penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClusterChuck Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 8 hours ago, CreaseAndAssist said: Adam Raska works hard, but he has zero offense to him at all. I don't have an issue with putting faster players on the ice for OT than what we often throw out there. I think Connor Dewar would be a logical player to give an opportunity to in OT; fast, some offensive ability and I think he's defensively capable too. Duhaime...nah. He is fast but I'd be afraid he'd take a dumb penalty. Very true It was more about getting speed and not so much a dance cotillion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomdog Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Last night when they were killing the ot penalty they really should have given Dewar a shift. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.