Podein25 5,751 Posted March 17, 2015 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Sounds like the GMs are leaning towards approving 3-on-3 OT when they meet tomorrow in Florida. Apparently they are convinced by the AHL data, which shows games that ended in OT vs Shootout jumped from 37% to over 70% after going to 3-on-3 (don't quote me on those #s, but I heard it on TSN radio).I hope they make the right decision cause I hate the bloody shootout. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Podein25 5,751 Posted March 17, 2015 Share Posted March 17, 2015 The NHL GMs have recommended 3-on-3 OT, either the AHL format (3 min 4-on-4, followed by 3-on-3) or, maybe 5 min straight 3-on-3 http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=758474&print=true Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hf101 3,156 Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 The NHL GMs have recommended 3-on-3 OT, either the AHL format (3 min 4-on-4, followed by 3-on-3) or, maybe 5 min straight 3-on-3 http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=758474&print=true Nearly 80% of all AHL OT games this year ended in overtime via their new format and about 60% of Overtime games in the NHL went to a shootout. Personally I'm still in favor of the 5 min OT. I'd like to see the NHL skip the 4 on 4 and having all of OT be via 3 on 3 before a shootout. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
notfondajane 366 Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 Nearly 80% of all AHL OT games this year ended in overtime via their new format and about 60% of Overtime games in the NHL went to a shootout. Personally I'm still in favor of the 5 min OT. I'd like to see the NHL skip the 4 on 4 and having all of OT be via 3 on 3 before a shootout.I'm don't like the shoot out I like to see a 20 minute 5 on 5 overtime playoff type for one period. First team to score wins. If no one scores,contest is a tie each team receives one point! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
OccamsRazor 9,999 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Making sense of all the team movement in minor league hockey this 2015 offseason http://www.broadstreethockey.com/phantoms/2015/5/4/8545695/minor-league-hockey-relocation-expansion-ahl-echl-ohl-2015 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
radoran 6,714 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Well, I think 3-on-3 will result in a lot more opportunities, especially things like breakaways when a guy gets behind the defense and has a one-on-one with the goalie and as we all know those situations clearly benefit the shooter... Oh, wait... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
OccamsRazor 9,999 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Well, I think 3-on-3 will result in a lot more opportunities, especially things like breakaways when a guy gets behind the defense and has a one-on-one with the goalie and as we all know those situations clearly benefit the shooter... Oh, wait... Yeah no doubt...Berube says G's confidence is shot.......................wonder why? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
OccamsRazor 9,999 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Well, I think 3-on-3 will result in a lot more opportunities, especially things like breakaways when a guy gets behind the defense and has a one-on-one with the goalie and as we all know those situations clearly benefit the shooter... Oh, wait... I can't figure out why Edmonton would want a AHL team in California??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jammer2 5,291 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 to the death LMAO!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jammer2 5,291 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 I can't figure out why Edmonton would want a AHL team in California??? It's a selling point for bottom tier UFA's.....if you don't crack our roster, you can still do crack and surf!! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.