Sometimes I don't understand Flyers fans...some were complaining signing Lecavalier would hinder Schenn and Couturier but now Emery should be fighting Mason for the # 1 job? My opinion is: Mason is still VERY young. He obviously has a ton of talent. He was fantastic his rookie year. I think he played so well for us last season after coming over b/c he saw it as a new beginning. The Flyers, a team that is usually in the hunt for the Cup, thought he was good enough to bring in and possibly take the reigns after ousting Bryz! (Possibly his thoughts, not mine). Now you bring in Emery and people want it to be a "you mess up, you're out!" situation? I loved Emery when he was here and still think he's great. But I'd rather see him used 25% of the time rather than 50%. I'm not saying if Mason plays horribly to start the season, goes 2-8 and has a 3.50 GAA to leave him out there. I just want him to have confidence that if he has a bad game, he's not going to ride the bench for 5 games. Rad, I know you keep pointing out the organization let Bob go because we were coddling Bryz, but Bob wasn't the most consistent goalie here. Perhaps he knew if he had a bad game he'd be riding the bench again. I whole heartedly agree we should have NEVER signed Bryz, and let Bob go with our #1 spot. I just think Mason COULD be that young # 1 we've always wanted and should be given the opportunity to grow here.