Don't get me wrong I'm not really wanting to argue NAK vs. Twarinsky today, I'm more concerned over the thought process that has Stewart over NAK. However, I'll expand a bit on NAK vs. Twarinski. NAK is a hybrid between what I "want" in a 4th liner and the NHL idea of a 4th liner. Good at moving the puck, good at getting the puck. Good motor, has some physicality. He just seems to lack some of the finish at the NHL level, but he also hasn't seen a ton of NHL time. And if you look back, Twarinski had a good camp last year, was one of the last cuts, and then had a middling AHL season. I worry that Twarinski is a guy who is able to up his game over a short period of time in the preseason and then doesn't do much after that. If NAK passes through waivers and that happens and they switch them out, no harm no foul, but if NAK is claimed and plays well, and Twarinski goes back to being JAG, it's not the end of the world, but it's not exactly good, either.
My statement still stands.