Podein25 Posted April 19, 2015 Share Posted April 19, 2015 That's a pretty fair assessment of the degree of the offense, and the damage done. Slashes happen all the time. And, the game is played at such intensity and speed, that these things are bound to happen. IMHO, Senators have made way too much fuss over this. Their preoccupation with Subban takes focus away from the series. You're bang on, especially your last point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J0e Th0rnton Posted April 19, 2015 Share Posted April 19, 2015 Dude, REALLY?hahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polaris922 Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 @Podein25@blocker He fractured his wrist with a two handed overhead chop... if that's not intent to injure what is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 He fractured his wrist with a two handed overhead chop... if that's not intent to injure what is? Flesh wound. Stone is still playing. Why does the existence of an injury imply intent? Or are you just looking for work in the NHL front office with that kind of logic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polaris922 Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 Flesh wound. Stone is still playing.Why does the existence of an injury imply intent? Or are you just looking for work in the NHL front office with that kind of logic? Let me bring a two handed over my head and smash your hand with it then tell me if you think I was trying to hurt you. If this were the normal smack on the glove trying to disrupt a pass or shot I'd buy your thinking, but a two handed over the head?? Not a chance. Hell I'd win this one in a criminal court, and the burden of proof is much much higher there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Let me bring a two handed over my head and smash your hand with it then tell me if you think I was trying to hurt you. If this were the normal smack on the glove trying to disrupt a pass or shot I'd buy your thinking, but a two handed over the head?? Not a chance. Hell I'd win this one in a criminal court, and the burden of proof is much much higher there.Wait a second. So, if the slash hits his stick instead of his wrist then you'd say there was no intent to injure?You're saying that Subban specially targets his wrist and with two moving targets (Stone and himself) manages to land a perfect, intent to injure strike? He's swinging his stick wildly. The odds are he's going to hit Stone's stick, which is of course his objective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polaris922 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Wait a second. So, if the slash hits his stick instead of his wrist then you'd say there was no intent to injure?You're saying that Subban specially targets his wrist and with two moving targets (Stone and himself) manages to land a perfect, intent to injure strike? He's swinging his stick wildly. The odds are he's going to hit Stone's stick, which is of course his objective.If this were a Giroux or Crosby, I'd say no. But Subban has a history of punk moves, and he didn't just start playing the game yesterday. Who the hell raises thier stick that high to stick check? Yes, I'm saying it was intent to injure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podein25 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 If this were a Giroux or Crosby, I'd say no. But Subban has a history of punk moves, and he didn't just start playing the game yesterday. Who the hell raises thier stick that high to stick check? Yes, I'm saying it was intent to injure.Just answer the question: if he hits Stone's stick is it still intent to injure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polaris922 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Just answer the question: if he hits Stone's stick is it still intent to injure?No because then you have to believe he was aiming for the stick. As it stands he was aiming for the hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J0e Th0rnton Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 @flyercanuck@Polaris922@yave1964 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 I don't know what the big deal is??? What is wrong with this??? H e was out of wood.......... HOLY CRAP IS THAT HILARIOUS!!! GREAT FIND OR!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J0e Th0rnton Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 @jammer2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.