radoran Posted June 28, 2013 Posted June 28, 2013 I just read on a forum where the Flames might be interested in getting two top picks in this draft and were interested in sending last year's #1 pick, Mark Jankowski, and 20-goal scorer Curtis Glencross to the Flyers for their 11th.Probably nothing to it, unless Glencross is willing to lift his No Movement Clause. Quote
OccamsRazor Posted June 28, 2013 Posted June 28, 2013 I just read on a forum where the Flames might be interested in getting two top picks in this draft and were interested in sending last year's #1 pick, Mark Jankowski, and 20-goal scorer Curtis Glencross to the Flyers for their 11th.Probably nothing to it, unless Glencross is willing to lift his No Movement Clause. aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh....NNNNNNOOOOOOOO! WE WANT MORE, WE WANT MORE!!!!!! Quote
pilldoc Posted June 28, 2013 Posted June 28, 2013 in honor of our former now departed goalie......ни в коем случае Хосе! Quote
mojo1917 Posted June 28, 2013 Posted June 28, 2013 @radoranwell considering the source, i'd give this an E6 1 Quote
Digityman Posted June 28, 2013 Posted June 28, 2013 in honor of our former now departed goalie......ни в коем случае Хосе!in any case, Jose??? that's what google translate tells me Quote
pilldoc Posted June 28, 2013 Posted June 28, 2013 in any case, Jose??? that's what google translate tells meLOL...supposed to be "No way Jose!".....LOL!!! 1 Quote
jammer2 Posted June 29, 2013 Posted June 29, 2013 puff, puff, PASS. At least one of the best draft ever, if not the best and we give away our #11 pick, a guy who should be an excellent player for 12-13 years....all for a few guys who are slightly above being called journeymen. Crappy teams make this kind of deal. Quote
radoran Posted June 29, 2013 Author Posted June 29, 2013 puff, puff, PASS. At least one of the best draft ever, if not the best and we give away our #11 pick, a guy who should be an excellent player for 12-13 years....all for a few guys who are slightly above being called journeymen. Crappy teams make this kind of deal.So, Laughton and Read for the Flames' 6th seems unlikely, then? Quote
jammer2 Posted June 29, 2013 Posted June 29, 2013 @radoran Yeah, real unlikely from my perspective. It takes a shake up of any teams core to get in there, unless other top picks are involved. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.