Jump to content

Game 64: Rangers at Flyers 2/28/20 at 7 PM


OccamsRazor

Recommended Posts

Time to come together. Everyone need to being on the same page.

 

Image

 

Huge game waiting. Flyers need to bring the Rangers back down to earth.

 

They are 9-1-0 in their last 10. Having won 5 in a row.

 

Flyers are rested Rangers are coming off a win vs Montreal.

 

Flyers have a one point lead over the NYI.

 

It would be nice to get the win in regulation.

 

I guess Hart gets the home start and Elliott gets the road game vs them on Sunday at noon.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


PROJECTED STARTING LINEUPS (subject to change, will be updated)

FLYERS

28 Claude Giroux - 14 Sean Couturier - 93 Jakub Voracek
21 Scott Laughton - 13 Kevin Hayes - 11 Travis Konecny
25 James van Riemsdyk - 38 Derek Grant - 18 Tyler Pitlick
12 Michael Raffl - 44 Nate Thompson - 62 Nicolas Aube-Kubel

9 Ivan Provorov - 15 Matt Niskanen
6 Travis Sanheim -5 Phil Myers
8 Robert Hägg - 61 Justin Braun

79 Carter Hart
[37 Brian Elliott]

Power Play 1: Giroux, Couturier, Konecny, Voracek, Provorov.
Power Play 2: JVR, Hayes, Aube-Kubel, Sanheim, Niskanen.

Scratches: 53 Shayne Gostisbehere (healthy).

LTIR: 55 Sam Morin (torn ACL, out for season), 23 Oskar Lindblom (Ewing sarcoma, out for season), 19 Nolan Patrick (migraines).

RANGERS

20 Chris Kreider - 93 Mika Zibanejad - 72 Filip Chytil
10 Artemi Panarin - 16 Ryan Strome - 17 Jesper Fast
33 Phil Di Giuseppe - 21 Brett Howden - 24 Kaapo Kakko
48 Brendan Lemieux - 14 Greg McKegg - 12 Julien Gauthier

42 Brendan Smith - 8 Jacob Trouba
18 Marc Staal - 77 Tony DeAngelo
55 Ryan Lindgren - 23 Adam Fox

49 Alexandar Georgiev
[30 Henrik Lundqvist]

Power Play 1: Kreider, Zibanejad, Strome, Panarin, DeAngelo
Power Play 2: Howden, Chytil, Kakko, Trouba, Fox

Scratches: 89 Pavel Buchenivich (soreness from car accident, day-to-day), 31 Igor Shesterkin (rib fracture from car accident, out 3+ weeks).

IR: 38 Micheal Haley (core muscle, Feb. 7)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two hottest teams in the eastern conference.    Will be a good test.   Thankfully catching them on the tail-end of a back to back.   No reason the Flyers shouldn't jump on them in the first.   There isn't an excuse to come out flat (again).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Digityman said:

Two hottest teams in the eastern conference.    Will be a good test.   Thankfully catching them on the tail-end of a back to back.   No reason the Flyers shouldn't jump on them in the first.   There isn't an excuse to come out flat (again).

 

I like the lines, but I'd start with Grant, Thompson and Pitlick/Laughton and hit everything that moves for the first minute. Old timey hockey

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Flyers will face Lundqvist though Georgiev played last night.

 

Surely they won't play him in back to back games. Right??  

 

Regardless it will be nice to come out and get the lead.

 

They need to be brought back down to earth and end their playoff hopes.

 

Flyers need to be up for the task. No starting slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Podein25 said:

 

I like the lines, but I'd start with Grant, Thompson and Pitlick/Laughton and hit everything that moves for the first minute. Old timey hockey

still not liking Laughton on the 2nd line. He's never been a top 6 player, and hasn't earned it. I still think id put (cough-ccough) NAK there

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Podein25 said:

 

Not sure I agree. The whole "top 6" / "bottom 6" thing is a bit antiquated thinking in my opinion. 

 

I like him moved around at times. He's one of a few players that could legitimately take a shift on any line and be good. I think he has sneaky offense for one thing, and he's not a liability.  Plus, he has a grit that other lines often lack and need. It messes with the matchups when you see him out there with G or Coots or whatever. So, I like moving him and NAK around like that.

 

Anyway, let's focus on Scott's TOI. His career average is 12:34. This season he's a full 2 min more at 14:34. I'd be perfectly happy if by this time next year he's at 16:34. More Scott Laugton on the ice is good in my opinion. He's my kind of player and should be your kind of player!

 

/end

Seems to me lately that he is having a hard time with his shots missing the net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laughton has 5 points (3 goals) the last 6 games I like his game.

 

He Hayes and TK have been hell to play against lately.

 

Let's get Giroux Coots and Jake back to the dominance they had a few years back and this could be a deadly team to have to play.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CoachX said:

👻 wasnt traded (just like I predicted all off season), so what's his deal? is he close to healthy and when does he return?

 

He's been a healthy scratch so I'm assuming his knee is fine and he could play. I like the option of being able to insert him in the lineup. He has a unique set of skills and can be a challenge for other teams to deal with. He can also suck dogsh!t, of course, so there's that.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CoachX said:

still not liking Laughton on the 2nd line. He's never been a top 6 player, and hasn't earned it. I still think id put (cough-ccough) NAK there

 

I think he's been pretty great with TK and Hayes. Small sample size, however the Sharks had no answer for them. 

 

It speaks well of him that he's able to slide up and down the line up . 

I don't know if I think he's the "answer" on the second line, but he won't hurt anything there either. 

I agree with @Podein25 the more he's on the ice the less chances for the other guys and he plays with an edge, definitely think you would like that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mojo1917 said:

he plays with an edge, definitely think you would like that.

oh hell yes I do. I sometimes thnk he's too conservative. I want to see more of that attitude we saw against Ottawa, who I ****** hate 🤬

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...