Jump to content

(Current rostered players on) Tort's must go list?


Samifan

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, JR Ewing said:

He was just poison to the results for anybody he played many minutes with

 

Exactly he didn't have anyone on the Flyers who could cover for him like Brett Pesce did for the Canes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GratefulFlyers said:

Still...unless it was something personal I agree with DeAngleo it was ridiculous for Tortorella to sit him 5 straight games. Everybody knows DeAngelo's history of being an a-hole and if that was the reason - fine.

 

But from a hockey standpoint? Come on. The guy blew coverage and got scored on all year - this year and every other year. Did it suddenly dawn on Tortorella in Game 76 that this guy can't play defense?

 

The Flyers weren't going anywhere; winning games only hurt their draft position. So why embarrass the guy at the end of the season? DeAngelo's history and Tortorella's are one and the same: both can be real assholes.

 

 

Never been a fan of either Tortorella or DeAngelo. But Tortorella wasn't Fletchers choice, and he was a bigger influence on getting him fired, so I'm on his side here. 

 

And before anyone brings it up...of course DeAngelos play had plenty to do with Fletchers firing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it amusing that there is any sympathy or understanding for the guy. He was lambasted as a douche from the day he was signed. None of us wanted that move. So what he got benched? Seriously who cares. He isn't a part of this team moving forward and nothing he would have done in those games would've changed anything, unless he took of his skate and stabbed someone 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoachX said:

He isn't a part of this team moving forward and nothing he would have done in those games would've changed anything

 

Flyers do have some good pieces to work with. They just need a star or two.

 

 

Center helped needed badly.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OccamsRazor said:

Flyers do have some good pieces to work with. They just need a star or two.

 

This is it. The Flyers have always had "good" players. They have not had a generational player since Lindros and haven't had a truly "great" player since... Pronger?

 

They have to scuttle the idea of putting together a rag tag group of grizzled vets who finally put it all together in a magical postseason run.

 

I think Briere is doing that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, radoran said:

They have to scuttle the idea of putting together a rag tag group of grizzled vets who finally put it all together in a magical postseason run.

 

 

That single handedly is the best description of Homer's plan I've ever seen.

 

And it happened once surely it could happen again is what they are hoping for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, flyercanuck said:

Never been a fan of either Tortorella or DeAngelo. But Tortorella wasn't Fletchers choice, and he was a bigger influence on getting him fired, so I'm on his side here. 

 

Fair enough. I like how Tortorella handled the Flyers this year and like you I am eternally grateful for the part he played in getting Fletcher fired. But this was a dick move plain and simple*.

 

*unless there was a personality/attitude/etc. problem...that (so far) they've kept to themselves.

 

Five straight games - especially the final 5 of the season - that is a gigantic FU to the player. Any other coach I'd give him the benefit of the doubt but Tortorella? The "personality/attitude problem" may have been his.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GratefulFlyers said:

that is a gigantic FU to the player. Any other coach I'd give him the benefit of the doubt but Tortorella? The "personality/attitude problem" may have been his.

 

That's karma...it's usually him giving a gigantic FU to his team.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, flyer4ever said:

Chuckles gave up 3 picks for TDA. Torts in his infinite wisdom completely devalued the player and made him worthless as an asset

So you're saying TDA is a good player and it was a smart move for the Flyers to trade for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, flyer4ever said:

Chuckles gave up 3 picks for TDA. Torts in his infinite wisdom completely devalued the player and made him worthless as an asset. I hope Briere fires him sooner than later. He's a human turd. Perhaps Bettman will hire him.


Even though to me Tortorella’s benching him 5 games seemed out of line, I don’t think Tortorella or any coach can devalue DeAngelo. He’s pretty much taken care of that himself. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, flyer4ever said:

Didn't say that at all. You can read what I said. 

I did. You said Tortorella "devalued" and made him "worthless". That must mean you feel that TDA had value and worth before. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No arguments about TDA with anyone in this group. No arguments that chuckles was the worst sign in the history of hockey. Perhaps I am not being clear enough, but the coach seems more interested in winning his personality battles with signed players than doing whats best for the franchise going forward. It is quite ironic, to me anyway, that the coach should have been the GM hire 5 years ago, rather than a headstrong coach who thinks he can fix whats broken in Flyerland by benching horrible acquisitions, when he should have been putting them in position to succeed in order to give them some, however small, value at the trade deadline. 

Winning games against non playoff teams in February was counter productive to the future of the Flyers. The current nucleus that showed some promise is still a mediocre group at best, including the coach. It needs to be torn down to the bones. Anyone who thinks otherwise is, IMHO dreaming in Holmgren technicolor.

We all want the same thing here, we do have different opinions on how best to get there, but they are just that, opinions, not hard facts. If we were all the geniuses some of us purport to be we would all have multiple cup rings and banners hanging from our rafters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, GratefulFlyers said:


Even though to me Tortorella’s benching him 5 games seemed out of line, I don’t think Tortorella or any coach can devalue DeAngelo. He’s pretty much taken care of that himself. 

This was my thought. I think this is a prime example of hating the coach more than you hate player.

 

Or it's a misguided opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, flyer4ever said:

No arguments about TDA with anyone in this group. No arguments that chuckles was the worst sign in the history of hockey. Perhaps I am not being clear enough, but the coach seems more interested in winning his personality battles with signed players than doing whats best for the franchise going forward. It is quite ironic, to me anyway, that the coach should have been the GM hire 5 years ago, rather than a headstrong coach who thinks he can fix whats broken in Flyerland by benching horrible acquisitions, when he should have been putting them in position to succeed in order to give them some, however small, value at the trade deadline. 

Winning games against non playoff teams in February was counter productive to the future of the Flyers. The current nucleus that showed some promise is still a mediocre group at best, including the coach. It needs to be torn down to the bones. Anyone who thinks otherwise is, IMHO dreaming in Holmgren technicolor.

We all want the same thing here, we do have different opinions on how best to get there, but they are just that, opinions, not hard facts. If we were all the geniuses some of us purport to be we would all have multiple cup rings and banners hanging from our rafters.

Defensive much?

 

Blaming Torts for this train wreck is a totally unfair. Staying specific to the point, how does sitting an a-hole player, who doesn't have any part in the the teams future, translate to not, "doing whats best for the franchise going forward"?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CoachX said:

Defensive much?

 

Blaming Torts for this train wreck is a totally unfair. Staying specific to the point, how does sitting an a-hole player, who doesn't have any part in the the teams future, translate to not, "doing whats best for the franchise going forward"?

 

His main goal was implementing a system and establishing order amongst the players.

 

He showed them hat he wasn't ******** around about buying in. If you don't he will sit your ass because he has a ship to run and he wants to coach the ones who are buying and are part of the future here.

 

The ones that were singled out and benched can look in the mirror he told you - you didn't believe he would do and well he showed your ass now sit the fcuk down and shut the fcuk up and wait for your exit review buh bye good luck in the future.

 

I don't feel sorry for them he did what i wanted done- didn't GAF how he did it as long as he did it.

 

And well those guys JVR, TDA and Hayes are on their way out good. And they won't be alone soon.

 

They were all given a chance and they failed stop the whining and pack your damn bags.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OccamsRazor said:

 

His main goal was implementing a system and establishing order amongst the players.

 

He showed them hat he wasn't ******** around about buying in. If you don't he will sit your ass because he has a ship to run and he wants to coach the ones who are buying and are part of the future here.

 

The ones that were singled out and benched can look in the mirror he told you - you didn't believe he would do and well he showed your ass now sit the fcuk down and shut the fcuk up and wait for your exit review buh bye good luck in the future.

 

I don't feel sorry for them he did what i wanted done- didn't GAF how he did it as long as he did it.

 

And well those guys JVR, TDA and Hayes are on their way out good. And they won't be alone soon.

 

They were all given a chance and they failed stop the whining and pack your damn bags.

:PostAward4:

 

I love Torts!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, CoachX said:

Holmgren is his mentor...

 

Just saying :IDunnoSmiley:

Hayes is a solid third line center at three million a year.  Columbus was looking for a center,  so the Flyers will have to eat 3-4 million of Hayes' contract over the remaining three years in order to unload him. It's still way better than paying him seven million, taking up a roster spot and having his lazy habits rub off on the young guys. If we get a third round pick back that's a bonus.  TDA will probably have to remain with the team until next year's deadline and then the Flyers can retain half his salary and dump him to a team that needs a PP specialist for the playoffs. Otherwise , the most I'd give to get rid of him is a 5th rounder or maybe a player that we were gonna dump anyway. There's always a team that has to hit the cap floor.

  • Like 1
  • Good Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2023 at 10:15 AM, RonJeremy said:

Hayes is a solid third line center at three million a year.  Columbus was looking for a center,  so the Flyers will have to eat 3-4 million of Hayes' contract over the remaining three years in order to unload him. It's still way better than paying him seven million, taking up a roster spot and having his lazy habits rub off on the young guys. If we get a third round pick back that's a bonus.  TDA will probably have to remain with the team until next year's deadline and then the Flyers can retain half his salary and dump him to a team that needs a PP specialist for the playoffs. Otherwise , the most I'd give to get rid of him is a 5th rounder or maybe a player that we were gonna dump anyway. There's always a team that has to hit the cap floor.

I could be wrong, but I don't believe the CBA let's you do that. You can eat half the salary in the first year (and a second team is allowed to eat another half of the half if you want) but the next year is back on the team you traded him to. I could be wrong though, cap stuff gets too confusing and generally I can't be bothered.

 

After reading over all the quotes and the 32 Thoughts thing it seems to me they are hedging on Hayes because they know he will hard to deal. De'Angelo who tf knows as Torts says they have to work it out man to man so to speak behind closed doors. Given his past, I suspect he simply doesn't do what he's told but again, dealing him will be hard. I wouldn't be surprised if he is here until the next deadline, when some team will take a chance on a D man for a playoff run. 

Konecny is probably easiest to trade so he might be. I also suspect Provorov gets moved just because they want picks and want to "do something". Honestly, it's going to be slow and painful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2023 at 11:18 AM, SCFlyguy said:

Isn’t JVR an UFA?  Even I don’t think the Flyers are dumb enough to resign him.

 

 Well it wouldn't be the first time. 

 

 

On 4/17/2023 at 11:18 AM, SCFlyguy said:

 

I don’t think Hayes and TDA are going anywhere unless DB is dumb enough to send picks to do it.

 

 

If they retain part of their contracts they're moveable. Nothing of great value mind you, but the value is in getting rid of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...